Trajectory of Cancer Caregivers

Trajectory of Cancer Caregivers Who are they? Relationship with the care receiver Belonging to a minority group Caregivers health Organization and acces to services Age Gender Socioeconomic situation DIAGNOSIS END OF ACTIVE TREATMENTS CANCER RECURRENCE PALLIATIVE CARE END-OF-LIFE CARE AND DEATH OF THE PERSON END OF CAREGIVING AND POST-CAREGIVING ENTRY INTO CAREGIVING PERIOD

TRAJECTORY OF CANCER CAREGIVERS Who are they? Relationship with the care receiver Locality Belonging to a minority group Caregivers’ health Organization and access to services Age Gender Socioeconomic situation Cancer type, stage, form and intensity of support PRE-DIAGNOSIS BEGINNING OF TREATMENT DIAGNOSIS END OF ACTIVE TREATMENTS CANCER RECURRENCE SURVIVORSHIP PALLIATIVE CARE END-OF-LIFE CARE AND DEATH OF THE PERSON END OF CAREGIVING AND POST-CAREGIVING PERIOD COMMUNICATION AND PARTNERSHIP WITH HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS RECOGNITION OF CAREGIVERS RESOURCES AND SUPPORT FOR CAREGIVERS

In collaboration with :

McGill - Ingram School of Nursing - École des sciences infirmières Ingram
Centre de recherche de St. Mary / St. Mary's Research Center
Proche ONKO Soutien aux proches aidants en oncologie

AUTHORS: Victoria Caucci, Sanjna Puri, Chantal Tardif, Sylvie Lambert, Florence Potvin
TRANSLATION: Lesley McCubbin
GRAPHIC DESIGN: Julie Brière
WEBSITE ANIMATION : [ ZAA.CC ] Design web

To cite this document: Observatoire québécois de la proche aidance (2025). Trajectory of Cancer Caregivers. CIUSSS du Centre-Ouest-de-l’Île-de-Montréal.

References

  1. Koczwara, B. (2016). Cancer and chronic conditions: Addressing the problem of multimorbidity in cancer patients and survivors. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1844-2  
  2. Junkins, C. C., Kent, E., Litzelman, K., Bevans, M., Cannady, R. S. et Rosenberg, A. R. (2020). Cancer across the ages: A narrative review of caregiver burden for patients of all ages. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 38(6), 782–798. https://doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2020.1796887  
  3. Hashemi-Ghasemabadi, M., Taleghani, F., Yousefy, A. et Kohan, S. (2016). Transition to the new role of caregiving for families of patients with breast cancer: A qualitative descriptive exploratory study. Supportive Care in Cancer, 24(3), 1269–1276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-2906-3  
  4. Kadambi, S., Loh, K. P., Dunne, R., Magnuson, A., Maggiore, R., Zittel, J., Flannery, M., Inglis, J., Gilmore, N., Mohamed, M., Ramsdale, E. et Mohile, S. (2020). Older adults with cancer and their caregivers -Current landscape and future directions for clinical care. Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 17(12), 742–755. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-020-0421-z  
  5. Bonnaud-Antignac, A., Hardouin, J.-B., Leger, J., Dravet, F. et Sebille, V. (2012). Quality of life and coping of women treated for breast cancer and their caregiver: What are the interactions? Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 19, 320–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-012-9300-9  
  6. Jeong, A., Shin, D., Park, J. H. et Park, K. (2020). Attributes of caregivers’ quality of life: A perspective comparison between spousal and non-spousal caregivers of older patients with cancer. Journal of Geriatric Oncology, 11(1), 82–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2019.05.020  
  7. Darley, A., Coughlan, B.,Maguire, R., McCann, L. et Furlong, E. (2023). A bridge from uncertainty to understanding: The meaning of symptom management digital health technology during cancer treatment. Digital Health, 9https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076231152163  
  8. Xiang, E., Guzman, P., Mims, M. et Badr, H. (2022). Balancing work and cancer care: Challenges faced by employed informal caregivers. Cancers, 14https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14174146  
  9. Given, B. A., Sherwood, P.et Given, C. W. (2011). Support for caregivers of cancer patients: Transition after active treatment. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 20, 2015–2021. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0611  
  10. Tan, K. R. (2021).A multi-method longitudinal study of caregivers of adults receiving an allogeneic bone marrow transplant [thèse de doctorat, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]. Carolina Digital Repository. https://doi.org/10.17615/ynbq-qq20  
  11. Solberg, M., Berg, G. V.et Andreassen, H. K. (2022). An emotional roller coaster—Family members’ experiences of being a caregiver throughout a cancer trajectory. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 17https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2022.2137965 
  12. Olson, R. E. (2011).Managing hope, denial or temporal anomie? Informal cancer carers’ accounts of spouses’ cancer diagnoses. Social Science & Medicine, 73(6), 904–911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.12.026  
  13. Serçekuş, P.,Besen, D. B., Günüşen, N. P. et Edeer, A. D. (2014). Experiences of family caregivers of cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 15(12), 5063–5069. https://doi.org/10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.12.5063 
  14. Northouse, L. L.,Katapodi, M. C., Schafenacker, A. M. et Weiss, D. (2012). The impact of caregiving on the psychological well-being of family caregivers and cancer patients. Seminars in Oncology Nursing, 28(4), 236–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2012.09.006  
  15. Ream, E., Richardson, A., Lucas, G.,Marcu, A., Foster, R., Fuller, G. et Oakley, C. (2021). Understanding the support needs of family members of people undergoing chemotherapy: A longitudinal qualitative study. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 50https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2020.101861  
  16. Molassiotis, A. et Wang, M. (2022). Understanding and supporting informal cancer caregivers. Current Treatment Options in Oncology, 23(4), 494–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-022-00955-3  
  17. Lambert, S. D., Jones, B. L., Girgis, A. et Lecathelinais, C. (2012). Distressed partners and caregivers do not recover easily: Adjustment trajectories among partners and caregivers of cancer survivors. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 44(2), 225–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-012-9385-2  
  18. vanRoij, J., Brom, L., Youssef-El Soud, M., van de Poll-Franse, L. et Raijmakers, N. J. (2019). Social consequences of advanced cancer in patients and their informal caregivers: A qualitative study. Supportive Care in Cancer, 27(4), 1187–1195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4437-1  
  19. Aung, S. H. H., White, K. et Bloomfield, J. (2021). The experiences and the needs of caregivers of patients with head and neck cancer: An integrative review. Cancer Nursing, 44(6), E361–E373. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0000000000000833  
  20. García-Carmona, M., García-Torres, F., JacekJabłoński, M., Gómez Solís, Á., Jaén-Moreno, M. J., Moriana, J. A., Moreno-Díaz, M. J. et Aranda, E. (2021). The influence of family social support on quality of life of informal caregivers of cancer patients. Nursing Open, 8(6), 3411–3419. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.887  
  21. García-Torres, F., JacekJabłoński, M., Gómez Solís, Á., Moriana, J. A., Jaén-Moreno, M. J., Moreno-Díaz, M. J. et Aranda, E. (2020). Social support as predictor of anxiety and depression in cancer caregivers six months after cancer diagnosis: A longitudinal study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 29(5-6), 996–1002. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15123  
  22. Lambert, S., Girgis, A., Descallar, J., Levesque, J. V. et Jones, B. (2017). Trajectories of mental and physical functioning among spouse caregivers of cancer survivors over the first five years following the diagnosis. Patient Education and Counseling, 100(6), 1213–1221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2016.12.031  
  23. Chong, E., Crowe, L., Mentor, K., Pandanaboyana, S. et Sharp, L. (2023). Systematic review of caregiver burden, unmet needs and quality of life among informal caregivers of patients with pancreatic cancer. Supportive Care in Cancer, 31(1), 74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-07468-7 
  24. Heckel, L.,Heynsbergh, N. L. et Livingston, P. M. (2019). Are cancer helplines effective in supporting caregivers? A systematic review. Supportive Care in Cancer, 27(9), 3219–3231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-04807-z  
  25. Harrison, R., Raman, M.,Walpola, R. L., Chauhan, A. et Sansom-Daly, U. M. (2021). Preparing for partnerships in cancer care: An explorative analysis of the role of family-based caregivers. BMC Health Services Research, 21(1), 620. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06611-0  
  26. Girgis, A., Lambert, S., Johnson, C., Waller, A. et Currow, D. (2013). Physical, psychosocial, relationship, and economic burden of caring for people with cancer: A review. Journal of Oncology Practice, 9(4), 197–202. https://doi.org/10.1200/JOP.2012.000690  
  27. Coumoundouros, C.,Ould Brahim, L., Lambert, S. D. et McCusker, J. (2019). The direct and indirect financial costs of informal cancer care: A scoping review. Health & Social Care in the Community, 27(5), e622–e636. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12808  
  28. Papadakos, J.,Ugas, M., Quartey, N. K., Papadakos, C. et Giuliani, M. E. (2023). Assessing the comprehensive training needs of informal caregivers of cancer patients: A qualitative study. Current Oncology, 30(4), 3845–3858. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30040291  
  29. Langegård, U., Cajander, Å., Carlsson, M., von Essen, L., Ahmad, A., Laurell, G., Tiblom Ehrsson, Y. et Johansson, B (2022). Internet-based support for informal caregivers to individuals with head and neck cancer (Carer eSupport): A study protocol for the development and feasibility testing of a complex online intervention. BMJ Open, 12(5)https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057442  
  30. Hoeck, B.,Ledderer, L. et Hansen, H. P. (2015). Involvement of patients with lung and gynecological cancer and their relatives in psychosocial cancer rehabilitation: A narrative review. The Patient, 8(2), 127–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-014-0076-x  
  31. Lambert, S.,Loban, K., Gignac, A. S., Magalhaes, M., Brahim, L. O., Chehayeb, S. et Wasserman, S. (2024). From patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to family-reported outcomes (FROs): Acceptability and perceived usefulness of routine screening in cancer care. Palliative & Supportive Care22(5). 1056–1064. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147895152400035X  
  32. Lambert, S. D., Girgis, A.,Lecathelinais, C. et Stacey, F. (2013). Walking a mile in their shoes: Anxiety and depression among partners and caregivers of cancer survivors at 6 and 12 months post-diagnosis. Supportive Care in Cancer, 21(1), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1495-7  
  33. Zhu, Y., Pei, X., Chen, X.et Li, T. (2023). Family caregivers’ experiences of caring for advanced cancer patients: A qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis. Cancer Nursing, 46(6), 270–283. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0000000000001104  
  34. Lambert, S. D., Harrison, J.D., Smith, E., Bonevski, B., Carey, M., Lawsin, C., Paul, C. et Girgis, A. (2012). The unmet needs of partners and caregivers of adults diagnosed with cancer: A systematic review. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care, 2(3), 224–230. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2012-000226  
  35. Samuelsson, M.,Wennick, A., Jakobsson, J. et Bengtsson, M. (2021). Models of support to family members during the trajectory of cancer: A scoping review. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 30(21-22), 3072–3098. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15832  
  36. Fancourt, D.,Warran, K., Finn, S. et Wiseman, T. (2019). Psychosocial singing interventions for the mental health and well-being of family carers of patients with cancer: Results from a longitudinal controlled study. BMJ Open, 9(8)https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026995  
  37. Green, A., Winter, N.,DiGiacomo, M., Oliffe, J. L., Ralph, N., Dunn, J. Chambers, S. K. (2022). Experiences of female partners of prostate cancer survivors: A systematic review and thematic synthesis. Health & Social Care in the Community, 30(4), 1213–1232.  https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13644  
  38. Kurtin, S. (2017). Livingwith multiple myeloma: A continuum-based approach to cancer survivorship. Seminars in Oncology Nursing, 33(3), 348–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2017.05.009  
  39. Otto, A. K., Ketcher, D., Heyman, R. E., Vadaparampil, S. T., Ellington, L. et Reblin, M (2021). Communication between advanced cancer patients and their family caregivers: Relationship with caregiver burden and preparedness for caregiving. Health Communication, 36(6), 714–721. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1712039  
  40. An, A. W.,Ladwig, S., Epstein, R. M., Prigerson, H. G. et Duberstein, P. R. (2020). The impact of the caregiver–oncologist relationship on caregiver experiences of end-of-life care and bereavement outcomes. Supportive Care in Cancer, 28(9), 4219–4225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-05185-2 
  41. Harrison, R., Raman, M.,Walpola, R. L., Chauhan, A. et Sansom-Daly, U. M. (2021). Preparing for partnerships in cancer care: An explorative analysis of the role of family-based caregivers. BMC Health Services Research, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06611-0  
  42. Nielsen, I. H.,Piil, K., Grønbæk, K., Kjeldsen, L. et Jarden, M. (2022). Experiences and needs of caregivers of adult patients with hematologic malignancies during treatment: A qualitative longitudinal study. Cancer Nursing, 45(5), E801–E809. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0000000000001054 
  43. Blum, K.et Sherman, D. W. (2010). Understanding the experience of caregivers: A focus on transitions. Seminars in Oncology Nursing. 26(4), 243–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2010.08.005  
  44. Aoun, S. M., Deas, K.,Howting, D. et Lee, G. (2015). Exploring the Support Needs of Family Caregivers of Patients with Brain Cancer Using the CSNAT: A Comparative Study with Other Cancer Groups. PloS one, 10(12). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145106  
  45. Halkett, G. K. B., Lobb, E. A., Shaw, T., Sinclair, M. M., Miller, L., Hovey, E. et Nowak, A. K. (2018). Do carer’s levels of unmet needs change over time when caring for patients diagnosed with high-grade glioma and how are these needs correlated with distress? Supportive care in cancer: Official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 26(1), 275–286.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3846-x 
  46. Milbury, K., Badr, H.,Fossella, F., Pisters, K. M. et Carmack, C. L. (2013). Longitudinal associations between caregiver burden and patient and spouse distress in couples coping with lung cancer. Supportive Care in Cancer, 21(9), 2371–2379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-1795-6  
  47. Whitaker, K. (2020). Earlier diagnosis: The importance of cancer symptoms. The Lancet Oncology, 21(1), 6–8. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/piis1470-2045(19)30658-8/fulltext  
  48. Kim, Y., Shaffer, K. M., Carver, C. S. et Cannady, R. S. (2014). Prevalence and predictors of depressive symptoms among cancer caregivers 5 years after the relative’s cancer diagnosis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 82(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035116 
  49. Stabile, C.,McCready, T., Ancker, J. S., Pusic, A., Temple, L. K. F., Vickers, A., Simon, B., Ashby, C. et Carter, J. (2022). A qualitative analysis of caregiver burden during the recovery process in ambulatory cancer surgery. Supportive Care in Cancer, 30(7), 5713–5721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-06991-x  
  50. Aydogan, U.,Doganer, Y. C., Komurcu, S., Ozturk, B., Ozet, A. et Saglam, K. (2016). Coping attitudes of cancer patients and their caregivers and quality of life of caregivers. Indian Journal of Palliative Care, 22(2), 150. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-1075.179598  
  51. Ysseldyk, R.,Kuran, N., Powell, S. et Villeneuve, P. J. (2019). Self-reported health impacts of caregiving by age and income among participants of the Canadian 2012 General Social Survey. Health Promotion & Chronic Disease Prevention in Canada, 39(5), 169-177. https://doi.org/10.24095/hpcdp.39.5.01  
  52. Kim, Y., Carver, C. S.et Cannady, R. S. (2020). Bereaved family cancer caregivers’ unmet needs: Measure development and validation. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 54(3), 164–175. https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kaz036  
  53. Fenton, A. T. H. R., Ornstein, K. A., Dilworth-Anderson, P., Keating, N. L., Kent, E. E., Litzelman, K.,Enzinger, A. C., Rowland, J. H. et Wright, A. A. (2022). Racial and ethnic disparities in cancer caregiver burden and potential sociocultural mediators. Supportive Care in Cancer, 30(11), 9625–9633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-07367-x  
  54. CanadianPartnership Against Cancer. (n.d.). Priority 2: Diagnose cancer faster, accurately and at an earlier stagehttps://www.partnershipagainstcancer.ca/cancer-strategy/strategic-priorities/priority-2-diagnose/ 
  55. Schatz, A. A., Brooks-Coley, K., Harrington, E., Murray, M. S.et Carlson, R. W. (2022). Patient, caregiver, and oncologist experiences with and perceptions of racial bias and discrimination in cancer care delivery. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 20(10), 1092–1098.e1092. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2022.7051  
  56. Iconomou, A. V.,Kalofonos, H. P., Kardamakis, D. et Gregoris. (2001). Impact of cancer on primary caregivers of patients receiving radiation therapy. Acta Oncologica, 40(6), 766–771. https://doi.org/10.1080/02841860152619205  
  57. McIntosh, A. W. M., Eby, J., Duggleby, W. et Leipert, B. (2012). “This is just where I live”: A situational analysis of rural end-of-life caregiving. Journal of Rural and Community Development, 7(4), 38–61. https://doi.org/10.7939/R3862BG0K  
  58. Ugalde, A., Blaschke, S., Boltong, A., Schofield, P., Aranda, S., Phipps-Nelson, J., Chambers, S. K., Krishnasamy, M., Livingston, P. M. (2019). Understanding rural caregivers’ experiences of cancer care when accessing metropolitan cancer services: A qualitative study. BMJ Open, 9(7)https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028315  
  59. Dumont, S., Jacobs, P., Turcotte, V., Turcotte, S.et Johnston, G. (2015). Palliative care costs in Canada: A descriptive comparison of studies of urban and rural patients near end of life. Palliative Medicine, 29(10), 908–917. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216315583620  
  60. Allison, K., Power, R., Ussher, J. M., Perz, J.et Out with Cancer Study Team(2024). “Queer people are excellent caregivers, but we’re stretched so very thin”: Psychosocial wellbeing and impacts of caregiving among LGBTQI cancer carers. BMC Cancer, 24(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11732-2  
  61. Tan, K. R., Waters, A. R., Chen, Q., Hendricks, B. A., Coombs, L. A. et Kent, E. E. (2023). Inequities among cancer caregivers with diverse identities: A review of the literature and future directions. Current Oncology Reports, 25(7), 803–812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-023-01415-3  
  62. Perks, L. G.et Tollison, A. C. (2025). “Teetering on a Tightrope”: Uncertainty and Information Management During the Cancer Pre-Diagnosis Phase. Western Journal of Communication, 89(2), 349–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2024.2340452  
  63. Wiljer, D., Walton, T., Gilbert, J., Boucher, A., Ellis, P. M., Schiff, S., Sellick, S. M., Simunovic, M., Bezjak, A. et Urowitz, S (2012). Understanding the needs of lung cancer patients during the pre-diagnosis phase. Journal of Cancer Education, 27(3), 494–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-012-0345-0  
  64. Molassiotis, A., Wilson, B., Brunton, L. et Chandler, C. (2010). Mapping patients’ experiences from initial change in health to cancer diagnosis: A qualitative exploration of patient and system factors mediating this process. European Journal of Cancer Care, 19(1), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2354.2008.01020.x   
  65. Shaffer, K. M., Kim, Y. et Carver, C. S. (2016). Physical and mental health trajectories of cancer patients and caregivers across the year post-diagnosis: A dyadic investigation. Psychology & Health, 31(6), 655–674. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2015.1131826  
  66. Kim, Y.et Schulz, R. (2008). Family caregivers’ strains: Comparative analysis of cancer caregiving with dementia, diabetes, and frail elderly caregiving. Journal of Aging and Health, 20(5), 483-503. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264308317533
  67. Leonidou, C.et Giannousi, Z. (2018). Experiences of caregivers of patients with metastatic cancer: What can we learn from them to better support them? European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 32, 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2017.11.002  
  68. Rothausen, C. S., Clausen, A. M., Voltelen, B. et Dieperink, K. B. (2023). Protective buffering: Nurses facilitating communication between adults with cancer and their adult family caregivers who overprotect one another—An integrative review. Journal of Family Nursing, 29(4), 417–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/10748407231156454  
  69. Kapari, M., Addington-Hall, J. et Hotopf, M. (2010). Risk factors for common mental disorder in caregiving and bereavement. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 40(6), 844-856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.03.014  
  70. Nouzari, R., Najafi, S. et Momennasab, M. (2019). Post-traumatic growth among family caregivers of cancer patients and its association with social support and hope. International Journal of Community Based Nursing and Midwifery, 7(4), 319–328. https://doi.org/10.30476/IJCBNM.2019.73959.0  
  71. Cai, Y., Simons, A.,Toland, S., Zhang, J. et Zheng, K. (2021). Informal caregivers’ quality of life and management strategies following the transformation of their cancer caregiving role: A qualitative systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Sciences, 8(2), 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2021.03.006  
  72. Mishra, S.,Gulia, A., Satapathy, S., Gogia, A., Sharma, A. et Bhatnagar, S. (2021). Caregiver burden and quality of life among family caregivers of cancer patients on chemotherapy: A prospective observational study. Indian Journal of Palliative Care, 27(1), 109–114. https://doi.org/10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_180_20  
  73. Badr, H., Gupta, V.,Sikora, A. et Posner, M. (2014). Psychological distress in patients and caregivers over the course of radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Oral Oncology, 50(10), 1005–1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2014.07.003  
  74. Matthews, S., Brett, J.,Ramluggun, P. et Watson, E. (2023). The psychosocial experiences of head and neck cancer caregivers following (chemo)radiotherapy: A systematic qualitative review and narrative synthesis. Psycho-Oncology, 32(10), 1469–1480. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.6202  
  75. Kim, J. Y., Sun, V., Raz, D. J., Williams, A. C., Fujinami, R., Reckamp, K.,Koczywas, M., Cristea, M., Hurria, A. et Ferrell, B. (2016). The impact of lung cancer surgery on quality of life trajectories in patients and family caregivers. Lung Cancer, 101, 35–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2016.08.011  
  76. Sterba, K. R., Zapka, J., LaPelle, N., Garris, T. K., Buchanan, A., Scallion, M. et Day, T. (2017). Development of a survivorship needs assessment planning tool for head and neck cancer survivors and their caregivers: A preliminary study. Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 11(6), 822–832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-017-0621-4  
  77. Foster, L. W., McLellan, L., Rybicki, L., Dabney, J., Copelan, E. et Bolwell, B. (2013). Validating the positive impact of in-hospital lay care-partner support on patient survival in allogeneic BMT: A prospective study. Bone Marrow Transplantation, 48(5), 671–677. https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2012.208  
  78. Jamani, K., Onstad, L. E., Bar, M., Carpenter, P. A., Krakow, E. F., Salit, R. B., Flowers, M. E. D. et Lee, S. J.(2018). Quality of life of caregivers of hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 24(11), 2271–2276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.06.015  
  79. Beattie, S. M. (2014). The psychosocial impact of being a caregiver and a care recipient during a hematopoietic stem cell transplant. [thèse de doctorat, Université d’Ottawa / University of Ottawa]. Research is the University of Ottawa’s digital repository. http://dx.doi.org/10.20381/ruor-6324  
  80. Chaar, D., Shin, J. Y., Mazzoli, A., Vue, R.,Kedroske, J., Chappell, G., Hanauer, D. A., Barton, D., Hassett, A. L. et Choi, S. W. (2019). A mobile health app (Roadmap 2.0) for patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant: Qualitative study on family caregivers’ perspectives and design considerations. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 7(10). https://doi.org/10.2196/15775  
  81. Langer, S. L., Yi, J. C., Chi, N.-C.et Lindhorst, T. (2020). Psychological impacts and ways of coping reported by spousal caregivers of hematopoietic cell transplant recipients: A qualitative analysis. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 26(4), 764–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.11.023  
  82. Hung, H. C.,Tsai, M. C., Chen, S. C., Liao, C. T., Chen, Y. R. et Liu, J. F. (2013). Change and predictors of social support in caregivers of newly diagnosed oral cavity cancer patients during the first 3 months after discharge. Cancer Nursing, 36, E17–E24. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0b013e31826c79d0  
  83. Sklenarova, H.,Krümpelmann, A., Haun, M. W., Friederich, H. C., Huber, J., Thomas, M., Winkler, E. C., Herzog, W. et Hartmann, M (2015). When do we need to care about the caregiver? Supportive care needs, anxiety, and depression among informal caregivers of patients with cancer and cancer survivors. Cancer, 121(9), 1513–1519. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29223  
  84. NikbakhtNasrabadi, A., Pahlevan Sharif, S., Allen, K. A., Naghavi, N., Sharif Nia, H., Salisu, W. J. et Yaghoobzadeh, A. (2022). The role of socioeconomic status in the relationship between social support and burden among cancer caregivers. European Journal of Cancer Prevention, 31(2), 198–203. https://doi.org/10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000683  
  85. Kershaw, T.,Northouse, L., Kritpracha, C., Schafenacker, A. et Mood, D. (2004). Coping strategies and quality of life in women with advanced breast cancer and their family caregivers. Psychology & Health, 19(2), 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440310001652687  
  86. Alfano, C. M., Leach, C. R., Smith, T. G., et al. (2019).Equitably improving outcomes for cancer survivors and supporting caregivers: A blueprint for care delivery, research, education, and policy. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 69(1), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21548  
  87. Girgis, A., Lambert, S. D., McElduff, P.,Bonevski, B., Lecathelinais, C., Boyes, A. et Stacey, F. (2013). Some things change, some things stay the same: A longitudinal analysis of cancer caregivers’ unmet supportive care needs. Psycho-Oncology, 22(7), 1557–1564. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3166  
  88. Webb, K., Sharpe, L.,Butow, P., Dhillon, H., Zachariae, R., Tauber, N. M., O’Toole, M. S. et Shaw, J. (2023). Caregiver fear of cancer recurrence: A systematic review and meta-analysis of quantitative studies. Psycho-Oncology, 32(8), 1173–1191. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.6176  
  89. National Cancer Institute. (n.d.). Caregiving after cancer treatment endshttps://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/coping/caregiver-support/caregiving-after-treatment 
  90. Kim, Y., Carver, C. S., Spillers, R. L., Love-Ghaffari, M. et Kaw, C.-K. (2012). Dyadic effects of fear of recurrence on the quality of life of cancer survivors and their caregivers. Quality of Life Research, 21(3), 517–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9953-0 
  91. Mellon, Kershaw, T. S. et Northouse, L. (2007). A family-based model to predict fear of recurrence for cancer survivors and their caregivers. Psycho-Oncology, 16(3), 214-223. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1074  
  92. Mitchell, S. E., Laurens, V., Weigel, G. M., Hirschman, K. B., Scott, A. M., Nguyen, H. Q., Howard, J. M., Laird, L., Levine, C., Davis, T. C., Gass, B.,Shaid, E., Li, J., Williams, M. V. et Jack, B. W. (2018). Care transitions from patient and caregiver perspectives. The Annals of Family Medicine, 16(3), 225–231. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2222  
  93. Kim, Y., Carver, C. S.et Ting, A. (2019). Family caregivers’ unmet needs in long-term cancer survivorship. Seminars in Oncology Nursing, 35(4), 380-383 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2019.151041 
  94. Stovall, E., Greenfield, S.et Hewitt, M. (2005). From cancer patient to cancer survivor: Lost in transition. National Academies Press. https://canceradvocacy.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/From-Cancer-Patient-to-Cancer-Survivor-Lost-in-Transition-Summary-.pdf  
  95. Kim, Y., Kashy, D. A., Spillers, R. L. et Evans, T. V. (2010). Needs assessment of family caregivers of cancer survivors: Three cohorts comparison. Psycho-Oncology, 19(6), 573–582. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1597  
  96. Lambert, S. D., Hulbert-Williams, N., Belzile, E., Ciampi, A. et Girgis, A. (2018). Beyond using composite measures to analyze the effect of unmet supportive care needs on caregivers’ anxiety and depression. Psycho-Oncology, 27(6), 1572–1579. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4696  
  97. Siegel, R., DeSantis, C., Virgo, K., Stein, K., Mariotto, A., Smith, T., Cooper, D., Gansler, T., Lerro, C., Fedewa, S., Lin, C., Leach, C., Cannady, R. S., Cho, H., Scoppa, S., Hachey, M., Kirch, R., Jemal, A. et Ward, E. (2012). Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2012. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 62(4), 220–241. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21149  
  98. Pace, A., Dirven, L., Koekkoek, J. A. F., Golla, H., Fleming, J.,Rudà, R., Marosi, C., Le Rhun, E., Grant, R., Oliver, K., Oberg, I., Bulbeck, H. J., Rooney, A. G., Henriksson, R., Pasman, H. R. W., Oberndorfer, S., Weller, M., Taphoorn, M. J. B. et European Association of Neuro-Oncology palliative care task force (2017). European Association for Neuro-Oncology (EANO) guidelines for palliative care in adults with glioma. The Lancet Oncology, 18(6), e330–e340. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30345-5  
  99. Bennardi, M., Diviani, N., Gamondi, C., Stüssi, G., Saletti, P., Cinesi, I. et Rubinelli, S. (2020). Palliative care utilization in oncology and hemato-oncology: A systematic review of cognitive barriers and facilitators from the perspective of healthcare professionals, adult patients, and their families. BMC Palliative Care, 19(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-020-00556-7  
  100. Krug, K.,Miksch, A., Peters-Klimm, F., Engeser, P. et Szecsenyi, J. (2016). Correlation between patient quality of life in palliative care and burden of their family caregivers: A prospective observational cohort study. BMC Palliative Care, 15(4)https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-016-0082-y  
  101. Kleine, A.-K.,Hallensleben, N., Mehnert, A., Hönig, K. et Ernst, J. (2019). Psychological interventions targeting partners of cancer patients: A systematic review. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, 140, 52–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.05.008  
  102. Butow, P. N., Price, M. A., Bell, M. L., Webb, P. M., deFazio, A., Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Quality of Life Study Investigators et Friedlander, M. (2014). Caring for women with ovarian cancer in the last year of life: A longitudinal study of caregiver quality of life, distress and unmet needs. Gynecologic Oncology, 132(3), 690-697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.01.002  
  103. Rowland, C.,Hanratty, B., Pilling, M., van den Berg, B. et Grande, G. (2017). The contributions of family caregivers at end of life: A national post-bereavement census survey of cancer carers’ hours of care and expenditures. Palliative Medicine, 31(4), 346–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216317690479  
  104. Yabroff, K. R.et Kim, Y. (2009). Time costs associated with informal caregiving for cancer survivors. Cancer, 115(18), 4362–4373. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.24588  
  105. Korman, M. B., Ellis, J., Moore, J., Bilodeau, D.,Dulmage, S., Fitch, M., Mueller, C., Sahgal, A. et Moroney, C. (2021). Dignity therapy for patients with brain tumours: Qualitative reports from patients, caregivers and practitioners. Annals of palliative medicine, 10(1), 838–845. https://doi.org/10.21037/apm-20-553  
  106. den Herder-van der Eerden, M., Hasselaar, J., Payne, S., Varey, S., Schwabe, S., Radbruch, L., Van Beek, K., Menten, J., Busa, C., Csikos, A., Vissers, K. et Groot, M. (2017). How continuity of care is experienced within the context of integrated palliative care: A qualitative study with patients and family caregivers in five European countries. Palliative Medicine, 31(10), 946–955. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216317697898  
  107. Alam, S., Hannon, B.et Zimmermann, C. (2020). Palliative care for family caregivers. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 38(9), 926–936. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.19.00018  
  108. Dumont, I., Dumont, S.et Mongeau, S. (2008). End-of-life care and the grieving process: Family caregivers who have experienced the loss of a terminal-phase cancer patient. Qualitative Health Research, 18(8), 1049–1061. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732308320110  
  109. Perez‐Ordóñez, F., Frías‐Osuna, A., Romero‐Rodríguez, Y. et del‐Pino‐Casado, R. (2016). Coping strategies and anxiety in caregivers of palliative cancer patients. European Journal of Cancer Care, 25(4), 600–607. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12507  
  110. Duggleby, W. D. et Williams, A. M. (2010). Living with hope: Developing a psychosocial supportive program for rural women caregivers of persons with advanced cancer. BMC Palliative Care, 9(3) (2010). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-684X-9-3  
  111. Benites, A. C., Rodin, G., Leite, A. C. A. B., Nascimento, L. C. et Dos Santos, M. A. (2021). The experience of spirituality in family caregivers of adult and elderly cancer patients receiving palliative care: A meta-synthesis. European Journal of Cancer Care, 30(4), e13424. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.13424  
  112. Palacio, C. et Limonero, J. T. (2020). The relationship between the positive aspects of caring and the personal growth of caregivers of patients with advanced oncological illness: Posttraumatic growth and caregiver. Supportive Care in Cancer, 28(7), 3007–3013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-05139-8  
  113. Canadian Cancer Society. (n.d.). Cancer statistics at a glancehttps://cancer.ca/en/research/cancer-statistics/cancer-statistics-at-a-glance 
  114. Hebert, R. S., Schulz, R., Copeland, V. C. et Arnold, R. M. (2009). Preparing family caregivers for death and bereavement: Insights from caregivers of terminally ill patients. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 37(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.12.010  
  115. Guldin, M.-B.,Vedsted, P., Zachariae, R., Olesen, F. et Jensen, A. B. (2012). Complicated grief and need for professional support in family caregivers of cancer patients in palliative care: A longitudinal cohort study. Supportive Care in Cancer, 20(8), 1679–1685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-011-1260-3  
  116. Gordon, T. A. (2009). Living in the memory of loss: Exploring the impact of aggressive, palliative, and hospice care and surviving loved ones [thèse de doctorat. University of Kansas]. 
  117. Viola, M., Gang, J.,Maciejewski, P. K. et Prigerson, H. G. (2023). Associations of financial hardship with suicidal ideation among bereaved cancer caregivers. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 41(2), 226–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2022.2067803  
  118. Morris, S.E. et Sannes, T. S. (2021). Bereavement care for family caregivers of neuro-oncology patients. Annals of Palliative Medicine, 10(1), 953–963. https://doi.org/10.21037/apm-20-708  
  119. Caserta, M., Utz, R., Lund, D.,Supiano, K. et Donaldson, G. (2019). Cancer caregivers’ preparedness for loss and bereavement outcomes: Do preloss caregiver attributes matter? OMEGA—Journal of Death and Dying, 80(2), 224–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0030222817729610 
  120. Canadian Cancer Society. (n.d.). Life after caregivinghttps://cancer.ca/en/living-with-cancer/helping-someone-with-cancer/caregiving/life-after-caregiving 
  121. Gulotta, R., Gerritsen, D. B., Kelliher, A. et Forlizzi, J. (2016). Engaging with death online: An analysis of systems that support legacy-making, bereavement, and remembrance. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901802 
  122. Harrison, M., Gardiner, C., Taylor, B., Ejegi-Memeh, S. et Darlison, L. (2021). Understanding the palliative care needs and experiences of people with mesothelioma and their family carers: An integrative systematic review. Palliative Medicine, 35(6), 1039–1051. https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163211007379  
  123. Garrido, M. M. et Prigerson, H. G. (2014). The end-of-life experience: Modifiable predictors of caregivers’ bereavement adjustment. Cancer, 120(6), 918–925. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.28495  
  124. Fitch, M. et Nicoll, I. (2019). Returning to work after cancer: Survivors’, caregivers’, and employers’ perspectives. Psycho-Oncology, 28(4), 792–798. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5021  
  125. Burnet, K. et Robinson, L. (2000). Psychosocial impact of recurrent cancer. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 4(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1054/ejon.1999.0033  
  126. Société canadienne du cancer. (2024).Tableau de bord des Statistiques canadiennes sur le cancer. https://cancerstats.ca/?la=fr  
  127. Cai, J., Zhang, L., Guerriere, D. et Coyte, P. C. (2021). The determinants of the intensity of home-based informal care among cancer patients in receipt of home-based palliative care. Palliative Medicine, 35(3), 574–583. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216320979277  
  128. Vivar, C. G., Canga, N., Canga, A. D. et Arantzamendi, M. (2009). The psychosocial impact of recurrence on cancer survivors and family members: A narrative review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65(4), 724–736. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04939.x  
  129. Shaffer, K. M., Kim, Y., Carver, C. S. et Cannady, R. S. (2017). Effects of caregiving status and changes in depressive symptoms on development of physical morbidity among long-term cancer caregivers. Health Psychology, 36(8), 770-778. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000528  
  130. World Health Organization. (2025). Cancer. https://www.who.int/health-topics/cancer#tab=tab_1 
  131. Allard, E. (2020). Accompagner un proche en fin de vie.Une réflexion sur les fragilités vécues par les proches aidant(e)s. Théologiques, 28(1), 75–95. https://doi.org/10.7202/1074676ar  
  132. Observatoire québécois de la proche aidance. (2025). Projet trajectoire : entrevues avec des personnes proches aidantes. https://observatoireprocheaidance.ca/trajectoire-des-jeunes-personnes-proches-aidantes-ppa/  
  133. Cai, J., Zhang, L., Guerriere, D., Fan, H. et Coyte, P. C. (2021). Where do cancer patients in receipt of home-based palliative care prefer to die and what are the determinants of a preference for a home death? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(1), 235. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010235 
  134. Cai, J., Zhang, L.,Guerriere, D., Fan, H. et Coyte, P. C. (2021). What variables contribute to the achievement of a preferred home death for cancer patients in receipt of home-based palliative care in Canada? Cancer Nursing, 44(3), 214–222. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0000000000000863  
  135. Matthys, O., Dierickx, S., VanGoethem, V., Deliens, L., Lapeire, L., De Pauw, A. … et Larkin, P. (2024). Sexual satisfaction and its predictors in patients with advanced cancer and their family caregivers in six European countries: Baseline data from the DIAdIC study. Psycho-Oncology, 33(6), e6347. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.6347  
  136. McGillivray, H. M., Piccolo, E. E.et Wassersug, R. J. (2021). “Partner”, “caregiver”, or “co-survivor”—might the label we give the partners of cancer patients affect the health outcome of the patients and their partners? Current Oncology, 29(1), 122–129. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29010010  
  137. OldertrøenSolli, K., de Boer, M., Nyheim Solbrække, K. et Thoresen, L. (2019). Male partners’ experiences of caregiving for women with cervical cancer—a qualitative study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 28(5–6), 987–996. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14688  
  138. Gilbert, E.,Ussher, J. M. et Hawkins, Y. (2009). Accounts of disruptions to sexuality following cancer: The perspective of informal carers who are partners of a person with cancer. Health, 13(5), 523–541. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459308336795  
  139. Pope, E. (1999).When illness takes sex out of a relationship. SIECUS Report, 27(3), 8–12. 
  140. Gilbert, E.,Ussher, J. M. et Perz, J. (2010). Renegotiating sexuality and intimacy in the context of cancer: The experiences of carers. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39(4), 998-1009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-008-9416-z 
  141. Canadian Centre for Caregiving Excellence. (2024). Caring in Canada. https://canadiancaregiving.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/CCCE_Caring-in-Canada.pdf 
  142. Lambert, S.D., Duncan, L. R., Culos-Reed, S. N., Hallward, L., Higano, C. S., Loban, E., Katz, A., De Raad, M., Ellis, J., Korman, M. B., Sears, C., Ibberson, C., Walker, L., Belzile, E., Saha-Chaudhuri, P., McTaggart-Cowan, H. et Peacock, S. (2022). Feasibility, Acceptability, and Clinical Significance of a Dyadic, Web-Based, Psychosocial and Physical Activity Self-Management Program (TEMPO) Tailored to the Needs of Men with Prostate Cancer and Their Caregivers: A Multi-Center Randomized Pilot Trial. Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 29(2), 785–804. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29020067  
  143. Fowler, H., Belot, A., Ellis, L., Maringe, C., Luque-Fernandez, M. A., Njagi, E. N., Navani, N., Sarfati, D. et Rachet, B. (2020). Comorbidity prevalence among cancer patients: a population-based cohort study of four cancers. BMC Cancer20(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-6472-9  
  144. Bradley, C. J. (2019). Economic burden associated with cancer caregiving. Seminars in Oncology Nursing. 35(4), 333–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2019.06.003  
  145. Bamgboje-Ayodele, A., Levesque, J. V., Gerges, M. et Girgis, A. (2021). The male perspective: A mixed methods study of the impact, unmet needs and challenges of caring for women with breast  Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 39(2), 235–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2020.1850600  
  146. Steiner, A. M. et Fletcher, P. C. (2017). Sandwich generation caregiving: A complex and dynamic role. Journal of Adult Development, 24, 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-016-9252-7 
  147. Lambert, S. D., Levesque, J. V.et Girgis, A. (2016). The impact of cancer and chronic conditions on caregivers and family members. Dans Koczwara, B. (dir.), Cancer and chronic conditions: Addressing the problem of multimorbidity in cancer patients and survivors (p. 159–202). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1844-2_6  
  148. Lambert, S., Audet, L. A., Ould Brahim, L., Schaffler, J., Garcia Ramirez, C., Frati, F., Sangha, S., Howard, A. F. et Lambert, L. (2025). Family-Reported Outcomes Measures (FROMs) Screening Programs: An integral part of chronic disease management.Cancer Control, 32https://doi.org/10.1177/10732748251339217  
  149. Arsenault, C.et Brochu, E. (2024). Trousse d’outils pour améliorer la transition vers « La vie après le cancer ». https://msss.gouv.qc.ca/professionnels/documents/projet-transition/trousse-outils_transition-vie-apres-cancer.pdf  
  150. Grbich, C. F., Maddocks, I. et Parker, D. (2001). Family caregivers, their needs, and home-based palliative cancer services. Journal of Family Studies, 7(2), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.5172/jfs.7.2.171  
  151. Villalba, E. (2025). Améliorer le soutien aux personnes atteintes d’un cancer en ce qui concerne leur sexualité et leur bien-être sexuel. Recommandations du Symposium sur le cancer, la sexualité et le bien-être sexuel – 11 septembre 2023. Coalition priorité cancer au Québec. https://coalitioncancer.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/FR_Symposium-Cancer-et-sexualite_rapport-1.pdf  
  152. CHU de Québec–Université Laval. (2023). Sexualité, apparence, intimité, couple, identité, pendant et après le cancer. https://www.chudequebec.ca/patient/maladies-soins-et-services/m-informer-sur-ma-maladie-ou-ma-condition/sexualite-apparence-intimite-couple-identite.aspx 
  153. Yuen, E. Y., Wilson, C., Livingston, P. M., White, V. M., McLeod, V. et Hutchinson, A. M. (2023). Burden prediction in cancer caregivers: Role of social support and connectedness. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care, 14. https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2022-004070  
  154. Pottle, J., Hiscock, J., Neal, R. D. et Poolman, M. (2020). Dying at home of cancer: Whose needs are being met? The experience of family carers and healthcare professionals (a multiperspective qualitative study). BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care, 10(1)https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2016-001145  
  155. Société canadienne du cancer. (2025).Types de traitements. https://cancer.ca/en/treatments/treatment-types?_gl=1*a2j4h1*_up*MQ..*_gs*MQ..&gclid=CjwKCAjw0sfHBhB6EiwAQtv5qRGxYMBSVV59VB9svmSvxf1vjKWetIpaBZ35Vrx5pi5-iPcwQKvw0BoCPQ0QAvD_BwE&gbraid=0AAAAAoQGxRJhsGWbhoqsuhdiv1cEa-KNn 
  156. Nguyen, N. H., Subhan, F. B., Williams, K. et Chan, C. B. (2020). Barriers and mitigating strategies to healthcare access in Indigenous communities of Canada: A narrative review. Healthcare, 8(2), 112. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8020112   
  157. Yangzom, K., Masoud, H., Hahmann, T. et Centre de la statistique et des partenariats autochtones. (2023, 6 octobre). Accès aux soins de santé primaires chez les membres des Premières Nations vivant hors réserve, les Métis et les Inuit, 2017 à 2020. Série thématique sur les peuples autochtones (publication no 41-20-0002). Statistique Canada. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/41-20-0002/412000022023005-fra.htm
  158. Bjorgvinsdottir, K. et Halldorsdottir, S. (2014). Silent, invisible and unacknowledged: Experiences of young caregivers of single parents diagnosed with multiple sclerosis. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 28 (1), 38-48. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12030
  159. Joseph, S., Sempik, J., Leu, A. et Becker, S. (2019). Young carers research, practice and policy: An overview and critical perspective on possible future directions. Adolescent Research Review, 5, 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-019-00119-9
  160. Moore, T. et McArthur, M. (2007). We’re all in it together: Supporting young carers and their families in Australia. Health & Social Care in the Community, 15 (6), 561–568. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2524.2007.00719.x
  161. Rivard, M., Lépine, A., Mercier, C. et Morin, M. (2015). Quality determinants of services for parents of young children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(8), 2388–2397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-014-0041-2
  162. Courcy, I. et des Rivières-Pigeon, C. (2013). Intervention intensive et travail invisible de femmes : le cas de mères de jeunes enfants autistes et de leurs intervenantes. Nouvelles Questions Féministes, 32, 28-43. https://doi.org/10.3917/nqf.322.0028

WHO ARE THEY?

Icône de statistiques

STATISTICS

According to a Canada-wide survey, approximately 11% of all caregivers support someone with cancer (1). This proportion makes cancer the second leading cause of caregiver involvement after aging-related issues (1). Translated to Quebec, this could potentially represent more than 150,000 caregivers. Moreover, cancer affects nearly half of the population, with 1 in 2.2 Canadians (45%) expected to receive a cancer diagnosis in their lifetime. Therefore, everything suggests that the number of caregivers supporting someone suffering from cancer will increase in the coming years (126).

Cancer is a large group of diseases that begin when abnormal cells grow uncontrollably, invade nearby tissues, and may spread to other parts of the body (130). Beyond the medical aspects, cancer affects the overall health and well-being of the person, creating a wide range of needs—physical, emotional, and social—that must be addressed.

Caregivers of people with cancer provide substantial and critical unpaid care, ranging from emotional support and household management to complex medical tasks, often with little to no formal training and recognition (3, 38). Cancer’s sudden intrusion into one’s life and unpredictable course thrusts caregivers into demanding, complex roles with little warning—often requiring rapid adaptation, emotional resilience, and ongoing flexibility (1). Additionally, for many caregivers, supporting someone with cancer raises many important questions about different matters such as life, their life plans, end of life, grief, death in general and their own death, as well as spiritual questions and beliefs. This can be very challenging for them, in addition to having to take on many tasks to support the person they care for (131).

As more people survive cancer and receive care outside the hospital, more caregivers are needed—making it essential to understand who they are, what they need, and how to support them (7).

NOTE

This trajectory focuses on people supporting someone with cancer, highlighting the challenges and influencing factors associated with this role. The realities and challenges experienced by people with cancer, although very important, are not the main focus of this trajectory.

Q

GENDER

Over half of cancer caregivers are women—most often spouses, daughters, or daughters-in-law—though male involvement is growing (1, 110). Female cancer caregivers typically report higher burden, poorer health, and greater anxiety and depression than male caregivers, along with more unmet needs and greater difficulty balancing caregiving with other responsibilities (16, 19, 48, 49). They are more inclined to feel exhaustion and fatigue compared to male caregivers (8).  Women often shoulder a disproportionate share of tasks while also juggling work, parenting or a marriage, leading to disrupted roles and heightened emotional distress (57). These disparities may stem from caregiving demands and the emotional weight of traditional gender roles (37). All the while, societal expectations indicate that women must remain stoic and selfless (57).

Male caregivers experience substantial strain too (5). Several interconnected reasons contribute to this: gender norms may discourage emotional expression and help-seeking, which can heighten depressive symptoms and perceived burden (16). Common unmet needs of male caregivers include addressing problems related to sex life, understanding the experience of the person with cancer, and receiving emotional support for themselves (145). Compared with women, men more frequently rely on avoidant or externalizing coping strategies (e.g., alcohol, smoking), which correlates with worse mental and physical outcomes (16).

Q

AGE

The age of the caregiver influences their experience. Caregivers who are 75 years of age and older are more likely to spend more hours on caregiving activities (51). Retired older caregivers may have the capacity to devote significant time to caregiving; however, this is seldom how they imagined their later years (10). While some studies suggest that older caregivers cope very well and experience fewer financial hardships compared to younger groups, potentially due to accumulated life experience, other research indicates that they still face significant mental health challenges (51, 16). At the same time, many caregivers are themselves aging—particularly spousal caregivers—who must balance their own health challenges while providing care and support to their partner (127).

Younger to middle-aged caregivers (35–64 years old) are particularly vulnerable to negative health impacts because they often simultaneously balance employment, parenting, and caregiving (146). This triple load decreases time and energy to fulfill their responsibilities (146). Whereas older adults might face more physical limitations, younger caregivers are more at risk of psychological distress (16). Financial strain is also common, as these caregivers may face limited resources, vocational instability, childcare expenses, and have fewer savings, leaving little margin to absorb the costs of caregiving (10, 19). These responsibilities can interfere with key personal milestones such as career advancement. 

Q

LOCALITY

For cancer caregivers, a rural or urban context can significantly shape their experiences, influencing access to care, financial strain, lifestyle disruptions, and available support networks (57). In rural settings, distance to hospitals often adds to an already heavy burden, with long commutes intensifying fatigue for patients and caregivers and creating barriers to timely care (13).  To mitigate these challenges, many rural caregivers make major life changes to accompany the care recipient—such as relocating closer to metropolitan cancer centers—to reduce travel time, lower costs, and access specialized care (58). This relocation can create ripple effects—disrupting rural home life, forcing caregivers to leave employment, reducing their capacity to manage domestic or farm responsibilities, and separating caregivers from their own support systems (58). Financial impacts are also greater: rural caregivers lose more work hours than urban caregivers due to the distance between their homes and care and service centers (59). They also incur higher out-of-pocket expenses for medications, transportation, and other care-related costs (58).

Access to specialized care, especially palliative services, is a key point of divergence. Urban settings offer more consistent hospital and home-based care, while rural caregivers often face long travel distances, limited home visit availability from professionals, and poorer care coordination (59). These disparities contribute to higher hospital death rates for rural patients and increased burden for their caregivers (58).

Rurality also disproportionately affects specific caregiver demographics, including women, younger caregivers, and those cared for by someone other than a spouse or child. Rural caregivers are more likely to care for multiple recipients and to report having had no choice in assuming the role (58). Also, for people living in remote areas, such as in many Indigenous communities, extreme weather can further limit or even cut off access to services for extended periods.

Q

SOCIOECONOMIC SITUATION

For caregivers with lower socioeconomic status (SES), the weight of their responsibilities is especially heavy. Caregivers with lower levels of education and income are more likely to experience emotional distress and report poorer physical health outcomes (16, 56). One study found that caregivers without a college education had more difficulties navigating the healthcare system, understanding health-related information, and communicating with the healthcare team (10). Full-time employment combined with a lower educational background can predict greater anxiety and depression among caregivers (16).

SES is also linked to the intensity of caregiving. Caregivers with lower SES tend to spend more hours per day providing care (104). This increased time commitment may be due to a lack of resources to spend on formal support (144). However, caregivers with higher income and educational levels also experience considerable stress when attempting to balance demanding careers with caregiving responsibilities (16). Across all income levels, strong social support remains a key protective factor against caregiver strain (16). For individuals with lower incomes or socioeconomic status, social support plays an even more crucial role. This shows that social support plays a particularly important role in helping families with fewer financial resources to cope with the burden of caring for someone (84). 

Q

BELONGING TO A MINORITY GROUP

Cancer caregivers belonging to a minority group often experience systemic exclusion and discrimination in healthcare settings, which might further exacerbate their burden and significantly shape the caregiving experience (53, 60, 61).

Underserved groups—including new immigrants, people of color, Indigenous peoples, and 2SLGBTQIA+ individuals—frequently encounter challenges that extend beyond the daily tasks of caregiving. From difficulties navigating healthcare systems to feeling dismissed or misunderstood by healthcare professionals, these caregivers often face an added layer of emotional and logistical strain (53).

Minority caregivers report more unmet needs when reintegrating into life after the person’s death, including challenges related to grief, employment, finances, and re-establishing social connections (52). Additionally, minority groups often experience delayed diagnoses and less engagement in routine cancer screening, leading to later-stage detection and, in turn, more intensive caregiving demands (1, 54). These disparities are compounded by systemic barriers such as racism, discrimination, and the lasting effects of colonialism, which limit access to timely, culturally appropriate healthcare (53).

  • Caregivers of color are more likely to report poor communication with healthcare professionals and to feel that their race or ethnicity negatively influences the quality of care received (55). Also, Black and Hispanic caregivers, who often take on more intensive caregiving roles, spend more hours per week, and manage a broader range of tasks compared to White caregivers (53). This greater involvement is accompanied by heightened financial strain (55). Yet, paradoxically, some studies – primarily U.S.-based – report that Black caregivers experience lower emotional and physical burden, potentially due to strong social networks, cultural values around familial responsibility, and a greater sense of preparedness (53). Similarly, Hispanic caregivers have reported emotional well-being on par with or better than that of White caregivers. While these cultural and community strengths may offer some protection, they do not erase the structural inequities these caregivers face.
  • 2SLGBTQIA+ caregivers report feeling worried about being excluded from medical decision-making or unrecognized as a caregiver due to the nature of their relationship with the person they care for or the lack of legal protections (60). Such discrimination can lead to worse health outcomes and increased feelings of loneliness (61). The experience of being dismissed, misgendered, or misunderstood by healthcare professionals can create a pervasive sense of fear and emotional strain (60). A recurring theme is the erasure of queer identity in care settings (61), whereby caregivers speak of “hiding one’s sexuality” or “taking a backseat from being 2SLGBTQIA+”.
8

 I remember questioning my sexuality, like, ‘Hmm I don’t entirely feel straight’, but I’m already dealing with so much, I have no emotional energy left to deal with this. So, I just kind of ignored it.
Cedar, a non-binary, bisexual person caring for their father (cited in 60)

  • Indigenous caregivers face significant challenges in accessing care and services (156). While many agreements and accommodations with Indigenous peoples are made at the federal level, health care delivery is managed by the provinces (157). This division of responsibility often creates confusion and makes it difficult to implement federal commitments within provincially governed health systems.

The completion of this trajectory revealed a glaring lack of literature on caregiving in oncology within minority groups – particularly Indigenous communities (10).

Q

ORGANIZATION AND ACCESS TO SERVICES

Cancer caregivers face a wide range of needs throughout their trajectory, yet access to services that meet those needs remains limited. Many caregivers take on their roles suddenly and with little preparation, which increases their burden and reduces their ability to support care receivers effectively (3, 29). Navigating the healthcare system can be overwhelming: caregivers frequently lack clear guidance and can struggle to find answers to their questions and the support they need (11). Most cancer care happens in an ambulatory clinic, which shifts complex medical tasks—symptom monitoring, medication management, infection vigilance, performing technical procedures, equipment handling—from clinic to home, turning caregivers into 24/7 coordinators, with minimal or no training (38, 7). Caregivers often act as intermediaries with healthcare providers; however, short clinical visits (typically 15–20 minutes) leave limited time to address caregivers’ questions and concerns (38). Poor care coordination and limited access to local specialists further increase the burden placed upon caregivers (76).

Access to services can be influenced by several factors (31, 53, 58, 59, 144), including:

  • Membership in a minority group
  • Locality
  • Socioeconomic status
  • Recognition of their role as a caregiver
  • Information about available services
  • Stage during which services are needed
Q

RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CARE RECEIVER

Spouses and partners often serve as primary caregivers, particularly when they live with the person they care for (23, 24). Living together typically involves taking on a range of daily responsibilities—coordinating care, attending appointments, and managing symptoms. While these shared experiences can strengthen the bond between partners, they can also increase caregiver burden (1, 24).

Caregiving spouses frequently emphasize the heavy responsibility of supporting their partner through illness, even when motivated by a promise, such as during marriage: “For better or for worse, in sickness and in health” (5). Being a caregiver to a partner means that the caregiver will take on new roles in relation to their partner, which may redefine the relationship. For example, some caregivers report that sharing their life with someone with cancer and supporting them affects intimacy and sexuality, either through a decrease or complete cessation of sexual relations within the couple, creating feelings of anger, confusion, sadness, and loneliness in the majority of caregivers (135, 136, 137, 138, 139). Although the subject of sexuality remains taboo, these issues have a considerable impact on their personal and relational lives throughout their caregiving trajectory. In addition to a considerable decrease in sexual intercourse, many caregivers report that sexual relations within their couple are no longer spontaneous and generate anxiety at the time of performance, or that they hesitate before initiating sexual activity for fear of putting pressure on their partner or hurting them by touching sensitive areas (138). Some caregivers will ignore or neglect their own sexual needs in order to prioritize their partner's health and daily needs (138) (for more information, see the subsection on intimacy and sexuality needs in Resources and Support for caregivers).They may even feel guilty about wanting to talk about their sexual needs with their partner, even if their relationship is characterized by excellent communication:

8

[My husband] didn't need to hear all that. [...] [H]e was the victim.
Margaret, caregiver for her spouse with cancer (cited in 140)

However, caregiving relationships extend beyond partners. Parents, adult children, siblings, and even close friends or extended relatives may also step in (1, 19, 25). These caregivers, who often do not live with the care receiver, may follow different trajectories shaped by distance, logistical challenges, and competing roles. Non-co-residing caregivers may face emotional strain, such as guilt or worry about not being physically present and must navigate the difficulties of managing care at a distance (18). While they may not provide intensive daily care, they often coordinate transportation, support medical decision-making, and manage care remotely, which can still impose significant stress (1).

Q

CAREGIVERS' HEALTH

Caregivers are increasingly described as “co-patients” because of the strong interdependence between their well-being and that of the person they care for (5, 10). The health of cancer caregivers both shapes and is shaped by the caregiving trajectory. On one hand, caregiver health is a contextual factor influencing how caregiving responsibilities are experienced and sustained; on the other hand, the physical and emotional demands of caregiving can themselves negatively affect caregiver health over time (102, 129).

Caregivers often experience parallel declines in physical and emotional health during treatment (5, 10), with their well-being mirroring patient symptoms and emotions—feeling well when the patient is doing well and distressed when the patient is unwell. In some cases, they even report worse quality of life and slower recovery than the care recipients themselves (10).  Prior illnesses (e.g., migraines) may worsen, whereas others develop new ones (e.g., hypertension, eczema) (13).

The role of caregiving can be more challenging when one is managing one's own health condition while providing care to someone with cancer. Many must manage chronic illnesses of their own (1). For example, older caregivers who frequently support aging spouses or relatives often face greater challenges due to physical limitations and higher rates of comorbidities (127). Caregivers of older adults are often older themselves and roughly 40% have comorbidities as well. Thus, they are more likely to report their health as fair to poor (3, 38).

Caregiver health is particularly critical during certain moments of the trajectory, such as before the death of the person. Better mental health at this stage is associated with a lower risk of post-bereavement depression, anxiety, and prolonged grief (48), whereas caregiver physical pain consistently predicts poor bereavement outcomes (69). Considering caregiver health throughout the trajectory is therefore essential, both to understand their capacity to provide care and to protect their long-term well-being.

Q

CANCER TYPE, STAGE, FORM AND INTENSITY OF SUPPORT

Cancer caregivers are among the groups providing the highest levels of support, highlighting the intensity of their role (1). Those with multiple caregiving responsibilities face even greater stress, and when care is not rotated among family members, primary caregivers are more likely to feel overwhelmed (82).

Caregiver responsibilities may include:

  • emotional support - offering companionship, listening to concerns, helping manage fear and uncertainty, attending appointments, being present through the highs and lows of the cancer (1). Providing emotional support is one of caregivers’ most frequent and essential tasks, yet it is also among the most demanding and the one they feel least prepared for (26). Caregivers often carry the emotional weight not just of the care receiver's distress, but their own as well (1).
  • personal care - feeding, bathing, dressing, assisting with transfers between bed, chair, or toilet (1).
  • medical care - administering medications and injections, managing catheters, wound care, colostomy bags (16). With changing demographics and fewer healthcare resources, caregivers are more and more involved in critical roles once performed by healthcare professionals (141, 142).
  • household tasks - grocery shopping, cooking, cleaning, outdoor chores (23). When a person becomes ill, caregivers often step in to manage household duties once shared or handled by the person with cancer.
  • financial management - household budgeting, paying bills, covering costs related to the illness, liaising with insurance providers and government agencies to secure financial assistance or benefits (1, 27)
  • advocacy, decision-making, and care coordination tasks - seeking out resources, clarifying medical information, facilitating communication between the person with cancer and healthcare professionals, scheduling appointments, arranging or providing transportation to medical appointments, promoting healthy behaviours, and helping to manage the person's nutrition (1, 8, 16, 23). In performing these tasks, caregivers often act as knowledge brokers, obtaining information about the person's medical needs, interpreting and synthesizing it, and then sharing it to support and facilitate care (28).
8

It was useful to be two people to hear the explanations, so I accompanied him to all his medical appointments, [to] reassure him too, because afterwards, when you leave the doctor’s office, it seems like everything gets magnified. He had a lot of questions, like, ‘Did he really say that to me? Is that it? Is it worse?’ So to be able to clarify and repeat the answers... I wrote everything down—I acted as his secretary. [free translation]
Lise, caregiver of her brother (cited in 132)

The level of support required varies greatly depending on several factors, including the type of cancer. Brain cancer, for example, often leads to rapid neuro-behavioral changes and physical decline, requiring intensive caregiver involvement early on (44). Lung cancer similarly imposes a heavy caregiving burden due to its high symptom load and extensive physical and psychological effects (46). The support needed also depends on the cancer stage. People diagnosed at an earlier stage tend to have better treatment experiences, lower morbidity, and improved quality of life (47). In contrast, advanced cancer drastically disrupts the social lives of both people living with cancer and caregivers, making it difficult to maintain normal routines and intensifying feelings of social isolation (18). Caregivers of patients with advanced cancer often struggle to balance caregiving with other responsibilities, with the emotional toll of supporting someone who may already feel detached from life (18).

Certain types of cancer will also have a greater impact on the couple's relationship when the caregiver supports a partner (135, 137). For example, in the case of brain cancer or tumors, the person receiving care may experience memory loss and reduced cognitive abilities, making intimate moments or sexual activities simply impossible (138). Certain cancers, such as prostate and cervical cancer, can have direct consequences on bodily functions, such as the inability to have an erection or engage in penetrative sex, which may cause some caregivers to stop initiating any sexual activity so as not to upset their partner, even though their sexuality is no longer what it used to be (138). Finally, certain types of cancer, such as prostate, ovarian, and cervical cancer, can compromise the ability of PPA patients and their partners to have children “naturally”, which affects the caregiving trajectory and its impacts on caregivers (137, 138).

On the other hand, a lot of patients with cancer have at least one long-term health condition at the time of the diagnosis (143). Comorbidities can also influence the timing of a cancer diagnosis, either prompting earlier medical attention due to overlapping symptoms or delaying detection due to symptom misattribution (70). Co-morbidities not only complicate cancer treatment but also place greater demands on caregivers, who must manage a more complex role (1). As a result, this elevated caregiving intensity can worsen the caregiver’s health and well-being as well as impact their psychological state with distress, anxiety and depression, having links to caregivers of care receivers with comorbidities (1).

Q

PRE-DIAGNOSIS

NOTE

There is a lack of literature specifically highlighting the caregiver’s experience within this stage of the caregiving trajectory. The limited research available during this stage is primarily focused on the care receiver's experiences, and the information below was inferred from this context.

In the pre-diagnosis stage, individuals may experience potential cancer symptoms or other concerning signs and may be undergoing testing (62). The length of the pre-diagnosis stage varies for potential patients and caregivers. Some consult primary care professionals for months or years, while dismissal and misdiagnosis can occur (54). Studies suggest that people may tend not to suspect they have cancer, so caregivers often play a critical role in early detection by recognizing initial symptoms and noticing the person is "not being themselves" (10). They have to encourage the person to seek medical attention and thus help initiate the diagnostic process—contributing to more timely diagnosis and treatment (64).

Waiting for a definitive diagnosis is characterized by significant uncertainty and anxiety for both the care receiver and their caregivers (5, 42, 62, 63). This uncertainty can come from anticipation of the diagnosis itself, but for some it is amplified, for example, when a known family history of cancer increases the likelihood of a positive result (62). Caregivers frequently provide essential emotional support in this uncertain stage and often begin actively searching for information about potential symptoms or diagnoses to better support the care receiver, especially as information needs escalate (63). While patients may consult their family physician and specialists, they also rely on information from caregivers, friends, printed materials, and the internet, with caregivers often helping to evaluate the reliability of this information (11).

CAREGIVERS’ NEEDS

CAREGIVERS’ NEEDS

Caregivers face needs rooted in uncertainty and the emotional strain of awaiting answers. They often seek to better understand the diagnostic process, including which tests are being conducted, expected timelines for results, and what these tests might reveal (62). Interpreting the care receiver’s symptoms and their potential causes is another key concern, as caregivers try to make sense of what these signs could indicate while remaining supportive (62).

During this stage, they may need guidance on how best to emotionally and practically support the person they care for through the stress of medical testing (62). Access to reliable and trustworthy sources of information becomes particularly important as caregivers try to educate themselves about possible diagnoses and prepare for the next steps (11). Finally, given the high levels of ambiguity and worry, caregivers themselves often struggle with how to manage their own anxiety and may benefit from resources focused on coping with uncertainty (62).

Q

DIAGNOSIS

8

If it was a disease that you could actually see, it would have had an effect on your everyday life, but in practice it doesn’t yet do that, so in that way it is very strange. There’s no difference except that we know something is going to happen.
Caregiver (cited in 11)

Even though for many caregivers, cancer caregiving trajectories actually begin during the pre-diagnosis phase, their caregiving trajectory “officially” starts once a cancer diagnosis is confirmed. Caregivers often find themselves "thrown into" a cancer life, with little warning or opportunity to prepare (25).

8

There was an ad at one point [on TV] where people were getting a cancer diagnosis, and then they all just fell over: it was like that for me. [free translation]
Lise, caregiver of her brother (cited in 132)

Caregivers at this stage navigate a landscape of uncertainty with little space to process emotionally and no forewarning or training for the multifaceted demands ahead (2, 42). Unlike chronic conditions that may emerge gradually, cancer symptoms often become apparent only weeks or months before diagnosis, resulting in a rapid and disorienting entry point into caregiving (66).

The diagnosis itself is typically experienced as a shock. It triggers psychological turmoil, leading to mental health decline. Caregivers may feel overwhelmed by the potential consequences of the illness (11). They can experience intense anxiety and distress equaling or exceeding that of the person they care for (1).  All the while, caregivers are providing emotional support to the care receiver (67). Some may try to hide their negative emotions to maintain a positive attitude for the person they care for (67), a strategy referred to as “protective buffering” (68).

8

I hold them (my thoughts and feelings) for myself
Caregiver, patient’s mother (cited in 67)

This can, in turn, lead to emotional exhaustion and neglect of their own well-being (1).

8

I needed help, but I had never asked for it
Caregiver, patient’s wife (cited in 67)

The diagnosis and the accompanying uncertainty about the prognosis disrupt caregivers’ sense of control over time, forcing them to put future plans—holidays, career ambitions, and financial decisions—on hold (12).  As one caregiver expressed, “It is not about winning or losing the battle against cancer; it’s about learning to live with it” (12). Caregivers supporting a spouse with cancer also experience changes in their sexuality as soon as the diagnosis is announced. Even before treatment begins, a cancer diagnosis often leads to a decrease in sexual activity within a couple due to the anxiety that sets in:

8

[I]n the beginning [pause] because you know you’re concerned and you’re not interested in sex.
Jessie, caregiver for her spouse with breast cancer (cited in 138)

How the diagnosis is communicated also shapes caregivers’ experiences. If clinicians convey hope for recovery when delivering the news, it can positively influence the caregiving trajectory, in contrast to a more somber, pessimistic tone (12).

Information-seeking is one of the prominent tasks caregivers take on after a diagnosis to try to better understand the illness, treatment options, and how to best support the patient (77). Caregivers frequently do not know where to turn to with the many questions that follow a diagnosis (11), and lack clear points of contact or reassurance during decision-making due to insufficient clinician support (11).

CAREGIVERS’ NEEDS

CAREGIVERS’ NEEDS

When learning the diagnosis, caregivers need information about the illness, prognosis, and treatment options to support decision-making (16). Although they prefer to receive clear, tailored information directly from healthcare professionals, they often encounter communication gaps—such as insufficient detail or a lack of personalization—which can leave them feeling unprepared and overwhelmed (55). As a result, many turn to alternative sources, including the internet or peer support networks, to fill these gaps, even though such resources vary in trustworthiness and can be time-consuming to navigate (55).

Caregivers describe this information-seeking process as a way to regain a sense of control, expressing a strong desire to “get more knowledge, to learn, to ask, to read” in response to the uncertainty of the diagnosis (77). They require clear and accessible guidance on the disease, treatment options, side effects, caregiving tasks, and available services (56). When caregivers experience distress early in the cancer trajectory, it often persists—and in some cases intensifies—over time, suggesting that time alone does not alleviate all needs (16, 17).

Q

BEGINNING OF TREATMENT

Treatment often begins immediately after the diagnosis, leaving caregivers little space to emotionally process what is happening (42). As the person receiving the diagnosis undergoes treatment and requires increasing levels of care, the caregiving role becomes intensely demanding—often leaving caregivers feeling overwhelmed, unprepared, and emotionally depleted (25).  

This stage is associated with a range of psychological, physical, social, and financial impacts: 

  • Psychological impacts: At the start of treatment, caregivers often worry about side effects, treatment effectiveness, and managing symptoms (14). Constant worry about prognosis, fear of death, fatigue, and the juggling of caregiving and work responsibilities contribute to high levels of anxiety, depression, and distress among caregivers (13, 16, 56). The emotional toll is amplified by their close involvement in managing care and witnessing the care recipient suffering firsthand (19, 24). Caregivers often describe the treatment stage of the trajectory as an “emotional roller coaster,” marked by feelings of guilt—such as pressuring the person they care for to follow treatment or witnessing the toll of side effects—and a profound sense of helplessness (11, 19).
  • Physical impacts: Caregivers face substantial physical strain—including fatigue, sleep disturbances, and pain—that can deteriorate their health faster than that of non-caregivers, sometimes worsening chronic conditions (13, 16, 27). Health habits often decline, with less exercise, poor diet, and weakened immune function, particularly among middle-aged caregivers (13, 51, 71).
  • Social impacts: As treatment becomes routine, caregivers often describe it as “taking over” their lives, eclipsing social roles and highlighting the all-consuming nature of the caregiving experience (15). Social isolation is common, as caregivers reduce participation in activities due to the care receiver’s side effects and the need to manage multiple roles—household tasks, employment, and caregiving (19). Many feel unseen or unacknowledged by friends and extended family who fail to grasp the depth of the caregiver's sacrifice (42).
8

When you are a caregiver, you forget about yourself […] you feel guilty for taking care of yourself.
Women caregiver (cited in 31)

  • Relational impacts: The patient-caregiver relationship may also suffer (13, 37). Caregivers often face challenges within the relationship, including difficulty communicating with the person they care for about the illness and their own concerns (34). They may also struggle to cope with personality changes in the person during treatment or choose to hide their own feelings to protect them (13). When the care recipient is a spouse, the caregiving role can also impact the relationship (13, 37). Indeed, cancer and its treatments can lead to significant impacts on intimate and sexual relationships, sometimes leading to feelings of being "just acquaintances rather than life partners" (37). For example, treatments and surgeries related to breast cancer can redefine or impose new limits on intimacy and sexual relations between partners (138). Indeed, spouses of people with cancer say that certain parts of their partner's body have become “off limits” due to the pain and discomfort experienced by the person with cancer, which can have an impact on the spontaneity and fluidity of sexual relations:
8

[Y]ou can’t sort of suddenly give her a big cuddle.
Ed, caregiver of his spouse with breast cancer (cited in 138)

Despite these difficulties, some caregivers report that the experience can lead to strengthened bonds and personal growth within their relationship with the person (15).

  • Financial impacts: Caregivers bear direct costs (e.g., transportation, medications) and indirect losses from reduced work hours or job changes. Employed caregivers frequently forgo promotions, switch to part-time roles, or work night shifts to accommodate medical appointments, compounding financial and emotional strain (1, 8).

TREATMENT TYPE

During treatment, people facing a cancer diagnosis typically undergo radiation, chemotherapy, and/or surgery, while bone marrow transplantation is increasingly used for blood cancers. Other types of treatments exist (e.g. hormone therapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapy), the type of treatment depends on the type of cancer, the stage of cancer, the personal preferences and the age of the person (155). Regardless of treatment type, caregiving is constant and intense during this stage as caregivers are required to perform several tasks (19, 23).

Surgery

With advancements in surgical care leading to earlier hospital discharges, caregivers are taking on a greater proportion of post-operative care (75). Caregivers often feel pressured to leave the hospital before they believe the person they care for is ready, but they do not want to cause problems (49). As one caregiver reflected:

8

after surgery, we felt pressured to leave…we didn’t feel like she was supported in [her] explanation that she wasn’t feeling well enough to go…I wanted to be as polite and helpful to the nursing staff…in retrospect I wish I had spoken up…
Caregiver (cited in 49)

Once discharged, caregivers report monitoring the person they care for to ensure they follow discharge instructions and do not push themselves too quickly (49). Responsibilities include assisting the person with navigating recovery at home and determining whether symptoms are expected or require immediate attention. During the early recovery period, when the person’s physical function is limited, caregivers often help with activities of daily living and provide emotional support, helping the person cope with fear, frustration, or body image concerns, particularly after surgeries that involve disfigurement or loss of function (e.g., mastectomy, colostomy) (49).

Radiotherapy and chemotherapy

Both radiotherapy and chemotherapy heavily involve caregivers to organize follow-up appointments, manage transportation, coordinate schedules of regular visits and lab tests, communicate with the healthcare team, and ensure the person adheres to treatment regimens (45, 72). Caregivers frequently act as advocates and information seekers, striving to understand treatment effects and ensure timely responses to emerging concerns (1). They must also be prepared to respond to acute and sometimes unpredictable side effects like severe nausea and fever, which can force responsibilities to change rapidly (16, 45, 73). Caregivers also provide support with symptom relief strategies and encourage the person they care for to report issues promptly (23). As fatigue often accumulates over the course of radiotherapy and chemotherapy can leave the person washed out,” caregivers may step in to assist with daily tasks such as hygiene, mobility (1, 11), meal preparation, and managing eating difficulties (73, 74). Emotionally, they serve as a consistent source of reassurance and comfort, helping the care receiver cope with the anxiety and isolation that can arise from the repetitive, often solitary nature of the treatment (73).

A distinguishing feature of radiotherapy is the daily nature of appointments (73). Caregivers often manage scheduling and transportation to and from appointments, prioritizing the care receiver's needs over their own schedule (73). On the other hand, chemotherapy can involve administering oral chemotherapy or medications through inserted catheters or feeding tubes and performing wound care at home (1, 45). Also, due to the person’s immunosuppressed state from treatment, caregivers must be attentive to prevent infections (42). Caregiving during chemotherapy is not only constant but also increases over time with the accumulated side effects (72)

Allogenic bone marrow transplant (allo-BMT)

Allo-BMT is increasingly used as a curative treatment for patients with blood cancers (21). Caregivers of people undergoing BMT have critical roles in symptom monitoring, medication adherence, and care coordination (77, 78). Importantly, caregiver responsibilities begin well before the transplant itself. People with cancer must undergo painful diagnostic procedures and frequent medical appointments to assess transplant eligibility, where caregivers provide both logistical and emotional support (10). Once approved, they are admitted for conditioning regimens—typically involving several days of high-dose chemotherapy and/or radiation to eradicate diseased and healthy marrow cells—which leave them physically fragile and socially isolated, heightening their reliance on caregiver support (10). Following the BMT, the caregiving role intensifies. Caregivers administer medications and injections, transport patients to frequent follow-up visits, and maintain a clean, safe environment to protect against infection in the patient’s immunosuppressed state (10, 79). They also monitor for complications, which can arise immediately or long after transplant, ranging from respiratory and neurological issues to severe psychological and physical symptoms (10). Given these risks, patients often require round-the-clock caregiving for at least 100 days post-transplant, and sometimes much longer (10). During this demanding period, caregivers not only deliver medical and practical assistance but also provide vital emotional support—often described by patients as being their rock (79). Practical responsibilities extend beyond clinical care, encompassing daily household management, meal preparation, and shopping, which grow in importance as patients continue to struggle with fatigue and diminished physical functioning even a year after treatment (79). Beyond hands-on care, caregivers act as advocates and communicators, navigating interactions with multidisciplinary transplant teams, interpreting complex medical information, and facilitating decision-making. This breadth of responsibility often leaves caregivers feeling stretched beyond capacity. As one caregiver reflected:

8

I was constantly feeling like I had to be everywhere all the time, and I wasn't doing anything well.
Caregiver (cited in 81)

CAREGIVERS’ NEEDS

CAREGIVERS’ NEEDS

Caregivers at this stage particularly need:

  • information about what to expect, treatment benefits and side effects, as well as alternative therapies (76, 83).
  • skill development training to manage the complex, hands-on tasks involved in cancer care (e.g. tube feeding, managing dysphagia) (19).
  • opportunities to ask questions and discuss their concerns directly with staff (37).
  • continued support and reassurance to sustain their confidence or self-efficacy in managing care and stress (147).
  • emotional and psychological support in coping with fears related to the care receiver’s physical or mental decline, and help processing thoughts and emotions around death and dying (83).
  • social support from friends and family members (21).
  • access to respite care or home healthcare services (82).
  • access to legal or financial counselling (82).
  • clear, consistent, and honest communication with healthcare professionals (37).
  • to feel included in the care process and valued as part of the healthcare team (34).
  • to be heard while advocating for the care receiver without being perceived as overly anxious (41).
  • accessible support systems and resources, ideally with flexible delivery methods like phone interventions due to time constraints and caregiving responsibilities (1).

Caregivers often under-utilize available services, particularly mental health services, due to guilt or a lack of awareness of formal support options (1). Proactive screening for caregiver distress and unmet needs is recommended to identify those at highest risk and connect them with appropriate resources (31, 148).

Q

END OF ACTIVE TREATMENTS

The shift after the end of active cancer treatments is often jarring for caregivers who, after devoting significant time, energy, and personal sacrifice during treatment, emerge with disruptions to multiple aspects of their lives (9).

Post-active treatment support and access to healthcare typically decline, creating a mismatch between care receiver needs and available resources—leaving caregivers at risk of prolonged burden and psychological distress. Many feel underprepared for the end of the treatment phase, struggling to meet the care receiver’s evolving recovery needs with limited guidance (9, 33, 38).

Lack of empathy and compassion from healthcare professionals during this transition compounds these challenges. Many caregivers report feeling dismissed, with limited support, vague reassurances (“everyone’s different”) and inadequate follow-up, which can contribute to distress, care plan nonadherence, and dissatisfaction with the healthcare system (76, 92). Barriers to follow-up care include poor care coordination and limited access to local specialists (34). Despite receiving written materials, most caregivers reported no formal end-of-treatment visit to support the transition (34).

CAREGIVERS’ NEEDS

CAREGIVERS’ NEEDS

Just after active treatments end, caregivers need help with the uncertainty they experience while adjusting to a “new normal” (87). Caregivers may struggle to reestablish social relations or intimate relationships, or may experience challenges in returning to work, addressing financial issues that accumulated during treatment or rebuilding their health (9).

A common need shared by both care receivers and their caregivers at this stage is the continuity of information, services, and support to help them navigate the physical, psychosocial, practical, and financial challenges arising from diagnosis, treatment, and its impacts (149). Indeed, follow-up care remains vital (76). Although caregivers may receive support during the active treatments stage, many report a troubling gap in integrated care and follow-up with specialists after this stage—especially when new health difficulties emerge (19). A structured and effective transition process is essential and acts as a bridge, gradually connecting the intensive treatment period with the period during which care receivers and their caregivers adapt and gradually resume their normal lives; it is equally important that preparation for this transition begin during active treatment (149).

Q

CANCER RECURRENCE

Cancer recurrence is not simply a continuation of the previous experience but a distinct stage that may even be more difficult and discouraging for patients and their caregivers to face (125). It might mark a transition from curative treatment to palliative care, complicating the disease trajectory and heightening caregiving responsibilities (125). Others face the weight of knowing that cancer will be a lifelong presence, and the decision to restart treatment or prioritize quality of life and the relief of symptoms may be a difficult decision to make (125). Extended or renewed caregiving during recurrence is often unexpected and overwhelming (49). When cancer recurs, caregivers are often thrust back into a state of emotional turmoil and uncertainty, and families are forced once again to reorganize around the illness (128). For many, the recurrence is even more devastating than the initial diagnosis (128).

 This was largely due to difficult decisions about treatment options, severe treatment side-effects and the negative memories of previous treatment experiences coming to mind (128). For caregivers, recurrence often signals the collapse of hope, replaced by anxiety, insecurity about the future, and distrust in treatment (128). As a result, such caregivers frequently report a poorer quality of life than those supporting newly diagnosed patients (128). Unlike the initial diagnosis, which includes a clear treatment plan and the possibility of a cure, recurrence often heralds a shift in care goals, for example, from curative to palliative, focusing more on symptom management, quality of life, and prolonging survival (125).

8

In 2023, he started experiencing health problems again. There were some tests, and cancer of the cardia [gastroesophageal cancer] was discovered. At that point, we knew it was the end—that he had a deadline because he wouldn’t make it. He would receive treatments, but he wouldn’t recover. They said, ‘Okay, there will be chemotherapy, but he won’t be cured.’ It was [to buy] time. [free translation]
Lise, caregiver of her brother (cited in 132)

Caregivers, having endured initial cancer stages, must re-evaluate their expectations and coping strategies amid a renewed sense of vulnerability and uncertainty (128). In fact, unexpectedly returning to the caregiving role due to recurrence may deplete the caregiver’s coping resources, leading to an increased risk for health problems (129). Feelings of shock, regret, frustration, guilt, and helplessness are common, especially when treatment is no longer effective (16). Long-term caregivers, in particular, exhibit increased depressive symptoms and may experience declines in their physical health (129). This emotional distress can arise from factors such as fear of the illness itself, lifestyle restrictions, conflicting priorities, financial issues, and witnessing the care receiver's suffering (19).

CAREGIVERS’ NEEDS

CAREGIVERS’ NEEDS

As distress escalates, some families grow closer, while others fracture under the pressure, highlighting the importance of supporting caregivers’ psychological well-being and family functioning throughout this stage (125). Strong social support is essential, as caregivers of patients with prolonged cancer often report increasing loneliness and social isolation over time. Conversely, greater social support is consistently associated with improved well-being (42, 102). Effective communication with healthcare professionals also plays a critical role—when caregivers receive clear, compassionate, and timely information about recurrence, treatment options, and prognosis, they feel more prepared and less overwhelmed (125). Caregivers frequently express a strong need for information on early warning signs of recurrence, both to reduce anxiety and to facilitate timely help-seeking and medical consultation (125). 

Q

SURVIVORSHIP: ADAPTING TO A NEW REALITY

Cancer caregiving continues well beyond active treatment and may last for years or decades (2). Caregivers continue to play multifaceted and evolving roles as care receivers move from active treatment into long-term management and recovery. Caregivers are central to facilitating the survivor’s transition to a “new normal,” supporting recovery while maintaining vigilance for signs of recurrence (16). Caregivers assist survivors in adopting or maintaining healthy behaviours such as proper nutrition, physical activity, medication adherence, and attending follow-up appointments (76). They may continue to coordinate healthcare services and advocate for the survivor’s needs, especially when transitioning from oncology to primary care settings (94). 

Sometimes recovery is slower than what cancer survivors and caregivers would like, and both cancer survivors and caregivers learn to manage these expectations (76). With cancer increasingly resembling a chronic condition, survivors may experience lingering symptoms, functional impairments and late effects of treatments, which require sustained caregiver involvement (8, 86). Depending on the cancer and treatment, caregivers may continue to monitor and manage lingering side effects or adapt to new, unexpected ones—including those related to irreversible changes like tracheostomy, altered appearance, or difficulty swallowing (1, 76). Intimate relationships may also be affected in the long term (37). The fact that there is no longer any active treatment does not mean a return to the sexuality and intimacy that the couple enjoyed before the onset of cancer. Some caregivers mention that they and their partners have regained some sexual activity, although it is less frequent than before. On the other hand, other caregivers mention that the onset of cancer and their experience through this ordeal have profoundly changed their sex lives, requiring a lot of time and work before regaining desire and pleasure:  

8

It was after treatment and a while after that, we thought something was missing. We tried again, but there was no success, so we have really worked hard to get things working again. It is now in the past; it has worked.
Caregiver of his spouse with cervical cancer (cited in 137)

Many caregivers enter survivorship expecting to “return to where we had left off, to normal life(76), only to encounter a “reality of uncertainty” marked by unpredictable follow-ups, ongoing care responsibilities, and shifting emotional needs (19). As one caregiver put it:

8

I need to have patience and understand it is a marathon, not a sprint.
Caregiver (cited in 76)

Survivorship care varies widely, and caregivers face numerous barriers—fragmented care coordination, limited access to local specialists, transportation issues, and financial burdens (76). As follow-up from healthcare professionals decreases over time, caregivers are often left to manage complex needs with limited guidance (9), underscoring the enduring and underrecognized burden they face during survivorship (38). Those heavily burdened during treatment remain particularly vulnerable, with distress continuing for years (17, 65).

In addition to anxiety and depression, caregivers report worries and uncertainty about recovery trajectories, recurrence, and managing unpredictable symptoms (76). They may remain concerned about the possibility of late treatment side effects, secondary diseases caused by treatment (e.g., cardiovascular disease) or the development of new cancers (86). Fear of cancer recurrence is common, the worry or concern about the cancer coming back or progressing, affecting approximately 48% of caregivers, often at levels equal to or exceeding those of care receivers (88).  It remains high even when the person is in remission and can arise at any sign of a physical problem (89, 120). It is more prevalent among younger female caregivers, those with limited emotional support, and those caring for someone with greater severity or distress (90, 91).

CAREGIVERS’ NEEDS

CAREGIVERS’ NEEDS

Even five years post-diagnosis, 40% of caregivers report unmet needs (96). Over time, caregivers’ needs shift—from focusing primarily on the person’s care to prioritizing their own well-being, typically around 1–2 years post-diagnosis. This includes attending to their own health and considering the impact the cancer has had on their career and relationships (87, 96). While less visible, caregivers must also learn to redefine their roles, transitioning from “protector” to “partner,” “son,” “daughter,” “brother,” “sister,” or other relational roles, while attending to their own needs and boundaries as the survivor regains independence (95).

Coping strategies such as emotional acceptance, hope, self-care, and connection are strongly associated with improved psychological outcomes and role satisfaction (48). Resilience is a key protective factor, and a proactive mindset can help reduce psychosocial distress, particularly when paired with caregivers’ efforts to focus on their own health and maintain a positive outlook throughout survivorship (37). As caregiving responsibilities shift from acute demands to long-term support, self-care practices—such as exercise, stress management, and hobbies—become increasingly important to prevent burnout and preserve a sense of control (97). Nonetheless, reengaging in healthy behaviours, including physical activity, hobbies, medical screenings, or dietary changes, can remain challenging when caregiving responsibilities persist (9). Caregivers can therefore benefit from a range of resources, including peer support, support groups, and psychological or spiritual wellness services (149).

During this stage, both cancer survivors and their caregivers report a high need for information, covering issues such as the risk of recurrence and new cancers, the prevention and management of comorbid conditions, and the late or long-term effects of treatment (149). Social support remains vital—whether through family, friends, faith communities, or peer networks—and bolsters caregivers’ confidence and emotional resilience (14).

For spousal caregivers in particular, renegotiating relationship dynamics—shifting from caregiver back to partner—can be unexpectedly difficult, especially if intimacy or roles changed during treatment (120). Many caregivers reflect on the toll cancer has taken on their relationships and report frustration at feeling invisible once active treatment ends (87). Coping together as a couple, through humour, optimism, shared problem-solving, or spirituality, has been shown to strengthen emotional resilience (37). This transition also requires open communication with the cancer survivor, as both may be coping with physical or emotional aftereffects (120). Honest conversations about challenges can help preserve intimacy and support mutual adjustment to post-cancer life (89).

Later in survivorship, as patients approach the five-year survival milestone, caregivers’ unmet needs often center on monitoring recurrence (e.g., managing fear of cancer recurrence), disease progression (e.g., processing feelings about death and dying), and recovery that may not be progressing as expected (76, 87, 96). Financial insecurity can also persist, with many caregivers continuing to seek support services (96). Additionally, caregivers frequently report a lack of self-efficacy as they transition to survivorship and navigate the new challenges associated with this stage (76).

Q

END OF CAREGIVING AND POST-CAREGIVING PERIOD

NOTE

The literature on post-cancer-caregiving is limited, with few studies directly addressing cancer caregivers’ experiences once active caregiving responsibilities have ended. As such, the content below is largely extrapolated from the broader survivorship literature that considers caregiver experiences years after a cancer diagnosis.

The end of caregiving, rather than restoring normalcy, often marks the beginning of a new and emotionally complex adjustment period. This transition can occur for various reasons, such as the complete remission of the illness or the death of the person being cared for.

At this stage, caregivers often seek to process their own experience and make sense of the caregiving trajectory (89). Caregivers may find it challenging to transition out of their caregiving role, especially when their identity has become entwined with caregiving (9). After months or years of prioritizing the care receiver’s well-being, caregivers may begin to reinvest activities they once enjoyed and carve out time for personal renewal (120). Reconnecting with hobbies, friends, or family—such as sharing a meal or seeing a movie—can help restore a sense of normalcy, especially after relationships were strained or neglected during caregiving (120). Some caregivers feel isolated as the intensive support they once received fades (89). Because others may hesitate to reach out, caregivers may need to initiate rebuilding social ties.

CAREGIVERS’ NEEDS

CAREGIVERS’ NEEDS

In post-caregiving period, caregivers may still face unmet needs, such as support in coping with fears of cancer recurrence, managing bereavement, or adjusting to the “new normal” of post-caregiving (93). This adjustment period often requires attention to their own mental and physical well-being (93).

 

8

I was worried 24 hours a day, and then [when my brother passed away] I felt kind of lost. I had the habit of saying to myself, ‘Oh my God, is he okay?’ But he wasn’t there anymore. It felt like something was missing in what I was doing. [free translation]
Lise, caregiver of her brother (cited in 132)

The transition from caregiving to life beyond caregiving may involve reintegrating into the workplace (124), rebuilding social connections (120), or resuming self-care routines (120) that were set aside during the illness. Reestablishing interpersonal relationships can be challenging, as friends and family may have moved forward with their own lives (89). Additionally, caregivers may struggle to relate to people who have not experienced cancer firsthand or the loss of someone close (89).

REMISSION

The process of slowing down after an intense fight with cancer and a demanding caregiving experience can feel as if “you’ve lost purpose” (120). Although remission brings relief, the abrupt slowing down of responsibilities can feel disorienting. Many cancer caregivers report feeling unprepared for this transition, struggling to redefine their identity and purpose after months or years of intense involvement in the person’s care. What they once hoped for—a return to normalcy—can feel strange or even unsettling (120).

BEREAVEMENT

Post-caregiving can be even more challenging when it coincides with bereavement, this period of grief and mourning after the death of the care receiver (89). In 2025, 87,400 Canadians were expected to die of cancer, leaving behind their bereaved caregivers (113). Although grief is a natural response, it may take months or even years to adapt—not only to the loss of the care recipient, but also to the loss of shared dreams and the caregiver identity itself (118). Some bereaved cancer caregivers experience prolonged and intense grief, marked by deep yearning, difficulty accepting the loss, and ongoing social or functional impairments (115, 116). Alarmingly, up to 40% of bereaved cancer caregivers experience complicated grief at 6 months post-loss, compared to about 11% in the general bereaved population after natural deaths (115, 116). Up to a quarter continue to struggle with complicated grief 18 months post-loss (115). 

Bereaved caregivers commonly report higher levels of depressive symptoms than those caring for survivors in remission (48), and for some, these feelings persist long-term. Simultaneously, caregivers may continue to face repercussions of their caregiver’s role as financial uncertainty remains after having shouldered practical and administrative tasks such as funeral planning, legal paperwork, and managing finances or estates (119).

CAREGIVERS’ NEEDS

CAREGIVERS’ NEEDS

Unmet needs during bereavement often increase over time: approximately 67% of bereaved caregivers report unmet needs 2.5 years after the person’s death, rising to 80% by 5.5 years post-loss (52). Ongoing unmet needs remain a primary source of suffering during the early years of bereavement (52). These needs typically fall into two broad categories:

  • Managing loss and coping with grief while taking care of one's physical and emotional health and maintaining meaningful relationships with family and friends (116). The death of a family member or friend can destabilize family dynamics, leaving caregivers feeling unsupported and isolated, particularly when their social networks had revolved around the caregiving role (52).
  • Reintegrating into life after the loss of a person they care for, such as resuming previously enjoyed social or recreational activities and rebuilding a sense of normalcy. It can be challenging for some caregivers as the transition from active caregiving to bereavement can disrupt a person's sense of identity, leaving caregivers uncertain of their role or purpose in life (52).

After the death, many caregivers engage in meaning-making and legacy work, including sharing their stories through blogs, participating in bereavement forums, or contributing to online memorials (121). When they take time during this period for reflection, positive memories may emerge—particularly when caregivers feel they honoured the person’s wishes during the emotionally intense end-of-life stage (16). Caregivers who use active problem-solving, positive reappraisal, and who hold strong spiritual or religious beliefs often report better psychological well-being in bereavement (69). In contrast, self-blame and behavioural avoidance are linked to worsened mood (69).

Whereas some find comfort in follow-up bereavement services, counselling, therapy and peer support, access often falls short of the need, revealing a gap in post-loss support (115, 122). Social support not only provides an emotional buffer but also serves as a key predictor of grief outcomes (69). Addressing family tensions early in the bereavement process is crucial to preventing family conflict and, ultimately, poorer bereavement outcomes.

Q

PALLIATIVE CARE

NOTE

A caregiving trajectory for palliative and end-of-life care is currently under development. Additional information on this stage will be available soon.

Some patients transition to palliative care (PC), which aims to relieve symptoms and enhance quality of life by addressing the physical, emotional, social, and spiritual needs of both care receivers and their caregivers (98). While often associated with end-of-life care, palliative care is a distinct and essential component of comprehensive cancer care. However, it faces persistent barriers. One major challenge is the widespread confusion between palliative care and hospice, with the latter more narrowly focused on the final stages of life. This misconception reinforces stigma and deters both care receivers and healthcare professionals from considering palliative care earlier in the disease trajectory (99). Compounding the issue, many healthcare professionals report uncertainty about when and how to initiate palliative care, reflecting a broader need for education and training on its core principles and benefits (99).

8

My brother and I understood that the oncologist was there to treat the [cancer], but he wasn’t there to address all the other symptoms. At the palliative care home [where I was volunteering], they told me, ‘He needs a palliative care doctor.’ I was scared, of course. But my goodness, how wonderful!, because they specialize in pain management. [free translation]
Lise, caregiver of her brother (cited in 132)

Palliative care often extends caregivers’ involvement, intensifying the emotional toll as the person’s condition declines (48). Caregivers of a person in palliative care face higher and more negative repercussions on mental and physical health and well-being than those in earlier stages of the trajectory (34):

  • Caregivers tend to develop negative emotions like shock, disappointment, regret, frustration and guilt if treatment becomes ineffective and the death of the patient becomes a reality (100).
  • This stage is also marked by the highest informal care costs, driven by increased caregiving hours and significant out-of-pocket expenses—such as specialized food for comfort, transportation, medications, and funeral-related preparations (8, 27).
  • The demands of palliative care on caregiving add to the stress and shock already experienced during diagnosis, which can create or worsen psychological distress among caregivers (48, 102). As a result, caregivers often experience a decline in physical health and quality of life, sometimes more severe than those caring for care receivers at other stages of the cancer trajectory (27).
  • Many caregivers grapple with the distress of witnessing suffering and confronting mortality, while also trying to shield the care receiver from their own fears (57). This stage is often marked by high levels of emotional exhaustion, anticipatory grief, and anxiety about the person’s decline (98). As one caregiver reflected, the worst part of the caregiving experience was to “watch someone I cared about fade away in front of my eyes” (57).
  • Mental health risks are heightened. Palliative care caregivers are more likely to experience psychiatric disorders than in other stages of the trajectory, reflecting increased psychological vulnerability (101).

In addition to hands-on care during this stage, caregivers often serve as intermediaries between care receivers and healthcare professionals, coordinating communication and seeking information to guide care decisions (1). When people with cancer experience cognitive decline or communication difficulties, caregivers are frequently thrust into decision-making roles regarding both medical care and household matters (1). Advance care planning serves as an important buffer. Completing documents such as do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders and having early conversations about the person’s wishes can help caregivers better prepare for bereavement (123). These interventions have also been shown to reduce caregivers’ feelings of regret (123).

HOME-BASED PALLIATIVE CARE

A growing trend toward earlier hospital discharges and limited access to hospice beds has led to an increase in home-based care for palliative and terminally ill patients (106). Further research has also indicated that the majority of people prefer to die at home (133). At-home palliative care presents a different set of challenges and opportunities. As care shifts from hospital to home, caregivers assume the bulk of daily responsibilities, including assisting with hygiene, administering medications and injections, managing symptoms such as nausea, breathlessness, seizures, or pain, and handling complex equipment like nebulizers (150). The impact of a person’s symptoms on caregivers can vary; for example, declines in emotional functioning and worsening dyspnea have been shown to significantly increase caregiver burden (100). They also take on household tasks—adapting meals to meet dietary needs, doing laundry, cleaning, and childcare—creating an unrelenting cycle of physical and emotional labour (150). Incontinence, which requires extensive washing and constant care, adds another layer of physical and emotional strain (150). One young caregiver caring for both parents described the endless routine of showering, cooking, cleaning, and caregiving as overwhelming:

8

I get up at 6 and shower my dad and, you know, carry out the usual. Every day it's just like showering, cleaning, washing, cooking, cleaning, washing, cooking and showering, and it gets endless and then back home again and you do the whole procedure again.
Young caregiver (cited in 150)

Caregivers describe certain advantages to caring for the care receiver at home. For one, having a sense of normality within the oncology trajectory, often tainted by hospital stays, was a comforting change (106). The ability to sustain relationships with others, being readily available to the care receiver and having a greater sense of control over the situation were further benefits to at-home palliative care environments (106). 

Home care services do not always provide consistent care by the same nurse or staff member, which can affect the quality of care and potentially cause distress for both caregivers and care receivers (107). When the same professional is involved from the initial evaluation through to the patient’s death at home, caregivers often report a greater sense of ease. As one caregiver shared:

8

The palliative care doctor came to our house every week with the pharmacist. At each visit, depending on my brother’s condition, they made sure his medication was still appropriate and, if needed, adjusted it on the spot to ensure he was as comfortable as possible. Between visits, we could contact them as needed. I felt so supported and truly part of the team, right up until the end. [free translation]
Lise, caregiver of her brother (cited in 132)

CAREGIVERS’ NEEDS

CAREGIVERS’ NEEDS

At this stage of the caregiving trajectory, caregivers need support in reducing the care receiver’s stress, learning how to discuss cancer in social situations, and coping with a lack of recognition of their role (102). Social support is a critical factor in alleviating caregiver burden during the palliative care stage (16). Reliable assistance from family members—providing social, emotional, and practical support—can reduce anxiety and distress and positively influence the remainder of the caregiving trajectory (108). Caregivers who receive strong family support are more likely to perceive their experience in a positive light (57). Friends also play a valuable role by offering a compassionate ear and much-needed emotional support during this difficult time (57). One caregiver described this help as: “Just knowing there’s somebody out there that’ll listen to you and have a good cry once in a while is a good deal” (cited in 57).

Early integration of palliative care can help address the needs and concerns of both the person with cancer and their caregivers, better equipping caregivers to manage the challenges of this stage (106). Team-based, family-centred support for care receivers and caregivers has been shown to improve mental health and caregiver satisfaction with the care received (107). Caregivers can benefit from support groups, services that assist with daily needs, medical or non-medical home care, and counselling (107). Additional supportive interventions, including psychoeducation and skills training, can significantly improve caregiver burden, information needs, coping strategies, physical functioning, psychological well-being, and overall quality of life (16). 

Q

END-OF-LIFE CARE AND THE PERSON’S DEATH

NOTE

A caregiving trajectory for palliative and end-of-life care is currently under development. Additional information on this stage will be available soon.

During the final three months of the person’s life, caregivers report providing an average of 69.5 hours of care per week (103). Among those supporting hospice care receivers, this number rises dramatically—averaging between 105 and 127 hours per week—highlighting the extreme intensity of end-of-life caregiving (104). Balancing one’s own needs with those of the person being cared for, the impact on work activities and decision-making amidst uncertainty are important challenges faced by caregivers at this stage (102).

8

He had become very weak, so I set him up in my room. I slept on the couch because I didn’t want to go downstairs—I felt too far away. But, let’s say that in the last days, I didn’t get much sleep, because with every movement, I was wondering if he needed me. [free translation]
Lise, caregiver of her brother (cited in 132)

Caregivers providing end-of-life care strive to offer the patient any support that may increase comfort, sometimes at considerable personal cost (27). In this stage, caregivers often act as advocates to ensure that patients die in their preferred place of care (154). At this stage, caregivers play a vital role in preserving the care receiver’s sense of dignity and meaning (105). This is especially important because the care receiver’s loss of dignity has been linked to increased distress, demoralization, and even a desire for hastened death (105). A better quality of death—marked by effective pain management, dignity, and alignment with the person’s values—can improve caregiver satisfaction with end-of-life care (105, 116).

The location of death matters: when care receivers die in their preferred setting, caregivers are more likely to report a sense of peace (57). While the majority of patients with cancer receive hospice or palliative care at home, a significant number do so in hospital or specialized facilities, where patients often pass away. In these institutional settings, caregivers may act as intermediaries between the patient and healthcare professionals, getting help for the patient’s needs, such as in cases of constipation, trouble breathing and other symptom management (120). When patients face cognitive decline or communication difficulties, caregivers are frequently thrust into decision-making roles regarding both medical treatment and broader life decisions, all while coping with emotional exhaustion, anticipatory grief, and anxiety about the patient’s decline (114). Caregivers of people who died in hospital palliative care units had fewer depressive symptoms, less anger and less complicated grief than those in other hospital units, suggesting a preference for less aggressive interventions near death (116).

The quality of the person’s end-of-life experience, advance care planning, social support, caregiver health prior to the loss of the care recipient, and coping strategies are all key protective factors that can influence caregivers’ adjustment during this period (69, 123).

CAREGIVERS’ NEEDS

CAREGIVERS’ NEEDS

Caregivers at this stage require support in preparing for the inevitable loss of the care recipient and its consequences. Although many caregivers recognize that the end of life is approaching, they often report feeling unprepared for the person’s death and its aftermath (114). They may also be unready for the practical demands following death—such as funeral planning, legal paperwork, and managing insurance—which can further compound their distress (52). This is concerning, as unprepared caregivers or those who struggle to accept the death may experience higher levels of depression, anxiety, and complicated grief during bereavement (114).

To manage the emotional toll of caregiving, particularly during end-of-life care, many caregivers rely on emotion-focused coping strategies such as acceptance, positive reframing, and maintaining hope—approaches shown to reduce anxiety and foster emotional stability in situations with limited control (109). Task-oriented coping methods, such as journaling, have also been found to be beneficial, especially for caregivers of individuals with advanced cancer; these methods help caregivers mentally process stressful events, such as the death of the care recipient, and reframe their sense of hope (110). During this stage, caregivers can benefit from support groups, assistance from family, friends, and the wider community, services to support daily needs, medical or non-medical home care, and counselling (107, 116). Additional interventions, including psychoeducation and skills training, have been shown to significantly reduce caregiver burden, meet information needs, and improve coping strategies, physical functioning, psychological well-being, and overall quality of life during the end-of-life stage (16).

Q

COMMUNICATION AND PARTNERSHIP WITH HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS

Strong communication and partnership with healthcare professionals are associated with reduced cancer caregiver burden and better outcomes (39). This allows for clear and personalized information, advice, and reassurance coming directly from healthcare professionals (44). However, caregivers often face communication gaps and challenges that hamper them in their role, such as a lack of personalized information and detailed explanations. Indeed, caregivers often feel there is a lack of interaction with medical professionals and that they rarely inquire about caregivers’ well-being (16). Caregivers are often overlooked by the healthcare team, for example, in clinical discussions, which makes them feel invisible, overwhelmed and alone while having to navigate a complex system (31). Frustration grows when they feel dismissed, unheard, or excluded from decision-making. This lack of recognition discourages them from asking questions, hindering the development of a collaborative care partnership (41).

Communication with the clinical team often serves as a protective buffer against the emotional and physical demands of caregiving, linked to higher self-efficacy, resilience, and lower burden, anxiety, and depression (20, 32). There is a strong call for healthcare systems to formally acknowledge and integrate caregivers into care plans, moving towards a family-centred or dyadic approach that considers both the care receiver and caregiver as a unit of care (1). Caregivers need opportunities to ask questions and discuss their concerns directly with staff and want to be "heard" while advocating for the care receiver without being perceived as overly anxious (25, 37).

When caregivers' needs are addressed through compassionate communication, personalized support, and collaborative partnerships with healthcare professionals, they feel more empowered and better equipped to care for both the person with cancer and themselves (62).

8

At first, the surgeon was making decisions that involved me [without consulting me]. Then at one point, I told him, ‘Hey, I’m part of the solution—he’s coming home with me afterwards.’ […] After that, the doctor really consulted me about everything, even about discharge and leaving the hospital. [...] So we became a team. [free translation]
Lise, caregiver of her brother (cited in 132)

Recognition by healthcare systems is also crucial for improving communication and partnership with caregivers. Acknowledging caregivers’ roles signals that they are valued as integral members of the healthcare team, rather than invisible support in the background (43).

Q

RECOGNITION OF CAREGIVERS

During their caregiving trajectory, many cancer caregivers feel unacknowledged by their circles and the healthcare professionals. They often express feelings similar to:

8

Most people don’t ask me how I’m doing...I think it’s hard that some people only care about him [the patient].
Caregiver (cited in 42)

Caregivers frequently assume their role as a given, not as an explicit choice, often as an extension of familial or marital ties (5), for example, the marital commitment to assist the person “in sickness and in health” (46). While approaching caregiving in this lens may strengthen caregivers’ resilience, it also may contribute to its “invisibility”, dismissing it as an expected marital responsibility rather than recognizing it as a specific and demanding role (5). Whether caring for a child, spouse, or aging parent, the transition into caregiving is deeply disruptive—redefining identities and altering previously stable life roles overnight (1).

 One caregiver described:

8

He became my priority. I’m going to explain it like this, but it’s very, very, very rational—almost as if I deliberately set my own life aside. It didn’t affect me, not at all. He was my priority. So, during that entire time, I didn’t go anywhere. I didn’t travel, I didn’t make any commitments. All my friends knew that if they invited me to dinner, I could decline at five minutes’ notice because he needed me. [free translation]
Lise, caregiver of her brother (cited in 132)

When becoming a caregiver, many caregivers report confusion about identifying with their new role:

8

I have gained new responsibilities, and I do not know whether I am really a caregiver or not. I assume that these are the duties of every child, but caregiving is probably something else.
A 20-year-old caregiver daughter (cited in 3)

Recognition in healthcare settings can be especially challenging. They are often described as a “hidden workforce” whose contributions are not fully acknowledged, and they express a desire to be recognized for their efforts (1, 11). Short clinical visits (typically 15–20 minutes) often leave little opportunity to address caregivers’ roles and concerns with the healthcare team (38). Many caregivers feel unseen or helpless despite being central to the care process (11). Caregivers who are not asked about their needs or included in care planning report higher emotional stress and lower quality of life (153). Too often, caregivers’ recognition is reduced to peripheral tasks such as driving patients to appointments, when in reality they are performing complex medical, emotional, and practical roles that directly affect patients’ outcomes. Proactive screening by healthcare professionals for distress and unmet needs is recommended to identify those at highest risk and connect them with appropriate resources (1). Furthermore, routine assessments of caregiver needs and referrals to tailored services, including self-management tools, can reduce burden and promote well-being (31, 86).

Acknowledging caregivers not only for their responsibilities but also as individuals with their own needs can lead to positive outcomes for both the caregiver and the care receiver (11, 43). Recognizing one’s role as a caregiver helps reduce feelings of isolation, facilitates access to support when needed, and underscores the importance of attending to one’s own emotional and practical needs. Caregivers consistently express a desire for their role to be acknowledged not only by healthcare professionals but also by patients, families, and society at large. Such recognition validates their efforts, affirms their identity beyond that of a helper or chauffeur, and strengthens their sense of competence and purpose in caregiving.  As one caregiver shared:

8

I think it’s important that they take us into account and that we have support services as well, because yes, the person is living [with cancer], but for us, we need help too. How am I supposed to help if I’m struggling to cope with it all and manage my own emotions? (free translation)
Lise, caregiver of her brother (cited in 132)

Caregivers who feel recognized report less depression, lower distress, and more positive perspectives on caregiving (43). Supportive acknowledgment, whether through healthcare teams, peer networks, or formal services, opens the door for caregivers to express their experiences, access guidance, and feel seen in their role (31).

Q

RESOURCES AND SUPPORT FOR CAREGIVERS

Caregivers need strong, available, responsive, inclusive, and easy-to-use support to navigate the crucial stages of their caregiving trajectory. Strengthening networks, both formal and informal, is essential to improve their resilience, mental health, and quality of life, and reduce the pressure they feel (16, 36, 37). Adequate support can improve caregivers' confidence or self-efficacy in managing care, and reduce their stress, consistently linked to quality of life (1).

PRACTICAL SUPPORT

Based on research on other categories of caregivers (158, 159, 160, 161, 162), offering quality support for the care receiver may be one of the best ways of assisting cancer caregivers, mainly because it lightens their load. Providing varied services and resources such as respite services, home care assistance, transportation services or counselling and emotional support for the assisted person could help ease the burden on caregivers, who no longer must bear these responsibilities alone.

INFORMATION

Meeting caregivers’ informational needs, especially around diagnosis, treatment plans, available services and the care receiver’s rights, is crucial to supporting caregivers in their caregiving tasks and decision-making process (11, 31). Clear and accessible information prevents caregivers from having to search for answers on their own, thus reducing their overall burden (11, 31).

In outpatient settings, caregivers are expected to assume complex tasks—processing medical information, performing technical tasks, and communicating with healthcare providers—often with little or no training (33). Information and training on medical tasks, such as managing feeding tubes or wound care, are crucial for improving caregivers’ confidence (49). Psychoeducational interventions and emerging digital health tools can help address caregiver needs, offering them more structured and accessible forms of support (16, 35).

An important responsibility for caregivers is to obtain, understand, synthesize, and share information about the care receiver’s medical needs to facilitate care. In this process, they often become, in a sense, experts on the medical condition of the person they support. Sometimes, caregivers—particularly family members and spousal caregivers—may even act as information gatekeepers, deciding how and when to disclose a diagnosis or other information to the care receiver in order to alleviate the patient’s fear and shock (16).

SUPPORT FROM FAMILY AND FRIENDS

Social support from friends and other family members predicts a reduced caregiver burden and better physical and mental health (21), can strengthen caregiver resilience (84), and can mitigate potential caregiver isolation. Indeed, the demands of caring for someone with cancer often profoundly disrupt social life. Many caregivers withdraw from leisure activities, social events, and relationships because this role demands much of their time and emotional energy (18). Some struggle to discuss the disease, as conversations are often met with discomfort or incomprehension by family and friends (13, 18). Constant disruptions in their plans, postponed appointments, cancelled outings, and missed milestones can leave caregivers feeling disconnected from their usual networks and lead to social isolation (8, 19, 20).

While the level of support received from family and friends is important, perceptions of its quality may differ from one caregiver to the next (21). Over time, caregivers might develop a more negative perception of the support provided to them, with less empathy, affection, and encouragement (21). Despite this, some caregivers find that their relationships deepen, that their family ties strengthen (13, 18). Taking on caregiving responsibilities can shift relational dynamics in ways that foster connection, meaning, and purpose even in an otherwise challenging time (13, 18).

Support between caregivers and care receivers is also crucial. Open and constructive communication, self-disclosure, and attentive listening can foster an environment that promotes intimacy for both the person with cancer and their caregivers. Such communication can also strengthen interpersonal relationships by allowing patients or caregivers who may have been holding in emotions to finally express them (105). Additionally, discussing the disease or oncology trajectory early can help caregivers prepare for what to expect and facilitate earlier acceptance of the situation (105).

EMOTIONAL SUPPORT

Compared to people with cancer, cancer caregivers are less likely to seek emotional support and rely more often on acceptance as a coping strategy (85). Throughout the cancer trajectory, caregivers often work to maintain a positive emotional environment for both themselves and the person they care for (12). One caregiver said:

8

I behaved as if it were something not very serious. In fact, I was suffering inside. I did not show it to him.
Caregiver (cited in 13)

In this context, peer support networks, both in-person and online, offer a safe space grounded in shared experience, providing comfort, emotional reinforcement and practical advice that help caregivers feel less isolated, as well as an outlet to manage their fears and emotions (20, 34, 16). Cancer helplines are another valuable resource, frequently accessed by caregivers seeking guidance or simply someone to talk to (24). Emotional support is most strongly associated with caregiver well-being, likely because it helps caregivers feel less isolated and provides an outlet for processing fears and emotions (20, 34).

Professional support is also crucial. Psychologists, social workers, and other healthcare professionals can provide structured emotional support and guidance. They can also teach coping strategies, which are important at several points throughout the caregiving trajectory.

SUPPORT FOR SEXUAL AND INTIMACY NEEDS

Several caregivers supporting a spouse or partner with cancer report experiencing significant impacts on their sexuality and intimacy. The cancer experience within a couple requires major adaptation and often disrupts its balance. In oncology, sexuality is frequently downplayed; patients are often simply advised to use lubricants. However, the difficulties that caregivers encounter in their intimate and sexual lives are broad, complex, and go far beyond the partner’s physical ability to engage in sexual activity. They may include fears of causing pain, difficulties communicating about sexual issues, or a considerable decrease in libido due to the burden and many demands associated with the caregiving role (138, 151).

Many caregivers find their sexual lives reconfigured and adopt various forms of physical intimacy, such as individual or mutual masturbation, manual stimulation, oral sex, massage, the use of vibrators, as well as cuddling and caressing (138, 140). These practices—often perceived as “alternative” compared to traditional, heteronormative sexual norms centred on penetration—gradually become “normal” and more fully integrated into the couple’s relationship:

8

[I]f we continue to explore alternatives, then maybe some will work and we can come out of it and put together a reasonable physical relationship again. Maybe even a better one.
Bob, caregiver to his wife with cancer (cited in 138)

The ability to reconfigure sexuality within a couple facing cancer is directly linked to healthy communication and a positive relational climate. Many caregivers mention that “making the effort” to communicate is enriching, both for their sexual life and for the couple’s relationship as a whole (138).

To mitigate the impacts of caregiving on this aspect of life, it is essential for practitioners and professionals to address sexuality openly and to create space for discussing related taboos. It is important to allow caregivers to express their fears, anxieties, desires, and concerns during interventions (152).

Q